BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 2(24)(iia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai69Delhi55Pune31Chennai27Cochin27Ahmedabad24Bangalore20Chandigarh20Kolkata15Jaipur13Nagpur8Rajkot6Visakhapatnam6Lucknow6Indore5Agra4Hyderabad4Karnataka3Patna3Amritsar3Raipur2Panaji2Varanasi2Jodhpur2SC1Cuttack1Surat1

Key Topics

Section 2605Section 115Section 245Exemption3

M/S CUTCHI MEMON UNION vs. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS)

In the result, the appeal is disposed of

ITA/534/2013HC Karnataka28 Sept 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,M.I.ARUN

Section 11Section 139Section 2(24)Section 2(45)Section 24Section 260Section 260A

trust or other legal obligation wholly for charitable or religious purposes or in part only for such purposes, or of income being voluntary contributions referred to in sub-clause (iia) of clause (24) of Section 2

M/S MARIMALLAPPAS CHARITIES vs. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, the order of the Income Tax

ITA/642/2016HC Karnataka11 Nov 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 11Section 260

2(24)(iia) of the IT Act deems all income received by the assessee Trust to the rigor of Sections 11, 12 and 13 of the IT Act? b) Whether the Tribunal is justified in law in holding that the appellant is not engaged in charitable

M/S MARIMALLAPPAS CHARITIES vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 1 (3)

In the result, the order of the Income Tax

ITA/643/2016HC Karnataka11 Nov 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 11Section 260

2(24)(iia) of the IT Act deems all income received by the assessee Trust to the rigor of Sections 11, 12 and 13 of the IT Act? b) Whether the Tribunal is justified in law in holding that the appellant is not engaged in charitable