BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “capital gains”+ Survey u/s 133Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai423Delhi287Jaipur232Bangalore181Hyderabad147Chennai109Kolkata77Surat74Pune61Chandigarh58Ahmedabad57Visakhapatnam52Indore51Rajkot50Guwahati26Nagpur23Cuttack23Amritsar23Cochin15Lucknow12Patna5Raipur5Karnataka4Allahabad3Jodhpur3Dehradun3Panaji2Ranchi2Agra1Telangana1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 260A5Section 133A3Section 115B3Section 2602Section 148A2Section 143(2)2Survey u/s 133A2

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 vs. M/S MINITECHS

ITA/714/2015HC Karnataka01 Apr 2016

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,JAYANT PATEL

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 260

u/s 148 and had also duly filed the revised computation of income. The AO’s view is that “when the rental income was already offered to tax, it was in the knowledge of the 6 assessee that the capital gains are also attracted on taking possession of the built up area”. As already stated, the issue was debatable

AZIM PREMJI TRUSTEE COMPANY PVT LTD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, I pass the following:-

WP/15910/2022HC Karnataka28 Oct 2022

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice S.R.Krishna Kumar

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 148ASection 56(2)

U/S 148A(d) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15 ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS W.P. COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DsAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:- ORDER In this petition, petitioner has sought for the following reliefs: “ (i) Quashing the impugned order dated: 28.07.2022 bearing ITBA/COM/F/17/2022- 23/1044214522(1) passed by Respondent No.1 under

SHRI NARAYAN RAO HEBRI vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal stands dismissed

ITA/166/2025HC Karnataka20 Feb 2026

Bench: S.G.PANDIT,K. V. ARAVIND

Section 115BSection 133ASection 143(2)Section 260Section 260A

capital gains and treated the sum of Rs.1,14,20,100/-, so declared, along with the unexplained cash of Rs.24,00,000/-, as income from other sources and subjected the same to tax under Section 115BBE of the I.T. Act. The assessment was completed by order dated 17.07.2019. 4.3 Aggrieved thereby, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Commissioner

THE COMMR OF INCOME TAX vs. NIKE INC

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/976/2008HC Karnataka07 Mar 2013

Bench: B.MANOHAR,N.KUMAR

Section 260A

survey was conducted under Section 133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short hereinafter referred to as `the Act’) in the premises of Nike Inc. – Liaison Office on 21.12.2002. The activities carried on by the company through - 15 - its office in India were verified. As return of income for the year was not filed by the assessee company, detailed