BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

185 results for “capital gains”+ Section 70clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,385Delhi1,800Bangalore764Chennai636Ahmedabad505Jaipur478Kolkata419Hyderabad310Chandigarh257Surat223Karnataka185Pune177Indore163Cochin152Raipur101Rajkot78Agra75Visakhapatnam73Nagpur60Cuttack57Calcutta56Lucknow49Amritsar47Telangana35Guwahati31Dehradun24SC23Jodhpur17Jabalpur11Patna9Ranchi8Allahabad7Rajasthan4Panaji3Kerala3Orissa2Varanasi2D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Andhra Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 260128Exemption26Depreciation25Deduction24Charitable Trust23Section 3221Section 1117Carry Forward of Losses16Section 14813

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. LATE KHOOBCHAND M MAKHIJA

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/496/2007HC Karnataka18 Dec 2013

Bench: N.KUMAR,RATHNAKALA

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 148Section 260Section 54(1)Section 54(2)

capital - 7 - gains to be eligible for the benefit under Section 54(1) and (2) of the Act had to be deposited on or before the due date prescribed for filing the income tax return under Section 139(1) of the Act, which was 31.7.1996, he deposited a sum of Rs.1,70

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. MRS SHAKUNTALA DEVI

Showing 1–20 of 185 · Page 1 of 10

...
Section 260A12
Set Off of Losses11
Capital Gains10

Appeal is hereby dismissed

ITA/340/2009HC Karnataka28 Sept 2016

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,JAYANT PATEL

Section 147Section 148Section 260ASection 54

Capital Gain Account Scheme. Thus, if the above conditions are satisfied, assessee is entitled to claim benefit of the provision of Section 54. 13. Facts on hand would disclose that assessee had owned a flat at Mumbai and sold the same on 04.02.2003 for a total consideration of ` 1,70

M/S KARLE INTERNATIOAL PRIVATE LTD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, the order of the income tax appellate tribunal

ITA/377/2012HC Karnataka07 Sept 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 10BSection 10B(5)Section 234BSection 260Section 260ASection 70

Section 70(1) Save as otherwise provided in this act, where the net result for any assessment year in respect of any source falling under any 12 head of income, other than “Capital gains

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI. VIKRAM REDDY

In the result, the fifth substantial question of

ITA/291/2013HC Karnataka24 Feb 2021

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,R. NATARAJ

Section 260Section 260A

gains have been returned and tax for Assessment Year 2006- 07 under Section45(3) of the Act and accepted in a proceeding under Section 143(3) of the Act. The resolution was forwarded on the same date i.e., 24.03.2006 to the company secretary of NCCPL with signature of the partners showing different status in which they were partners including their

M/S KEMFIN SERVICES PVT LTD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA/70/2011HC Karnataka11 Jun 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

Section 143(2)Section 260Section 260ASection 88E

70 OF 2011 ITA NO.149/2011 BETWEEN: M/S KEMFIN SERVICES PVT. LTD. KEMWELL HOUSE, 11, TUMKUR ROAD BANGALORE – 560 022. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI.CHYTHANYA K.K., ADV.,) AND: THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE – 11 (5) BANGALORE ... RESPONDENT (By Sri.K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.) - - - THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE I.T.ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 30.03.2011 PASSED

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S HMA DATA SYSTEMS P LTD.,

ITA/700/2009HC Karnataka26 Jun 2015

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR

Section 260A

70,66,590/-. The assessing officer after issuing notice under section 143(2) after selecting the return for 7 scrutiny has proceeded to frame the assessment order under Section 143(3) by order dated 22.12.2006, whereunder disallowances to the tune of `2,67,85,610/- was made. During the previous year relevant to the assessment year, assessee sold

M/S HMA DATA SYSTEM P LTD., vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/684/2009HC Karnataka26 Jun 2015

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR

Section 260A

70,66,590/-. The assessing officer after issuing notice under section 143(2) after selecting the return for 7 scrutiny has proceeded to frame the assessment order under Section 143(3) by order dated 22.12.2006, whereunder disallowances to the tune of `2,67,85,610/- was made. During the previous year relevant to the assessment year, assessee sold

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. KUMERGODE INVESTMENTS LTD

Appeal is Dismissed

ITA/218/2009HC Karnataka13 Jan 2015

Bench: B.VEERAPPA,N.KUMAR

Section 260ASection 263

Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, restoring the order of the Assessing Authority. 2. The Assessee Company is in the business of financial investments. During the year 2003-04, the assessee company earned capital gain of Rs.1,23,70

SMT JOSHNA RAJENDRA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

Accordingly, it stands dismissed

ITA/8/2018HC Karnataka04 Dec 2019

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

Section 143(1)(a)Section 147Section 148Section 260Section 50C

70,17,500/-, it attracted capital gains tax as per the provisions of Section 50C of the Act. The basis

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S KHIVRAJ MOTORS

Appeal is hereby dismissed;

ITA/426/2009HC Karnataka17 Jul 2015

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,VINEET SARAN

Section 260

Section 263 of the Act with a direction to the Assessing Officer to redo the same and consequently the appeal before the Tribunal has become infructuous? b) Whether the Appellate Authorities were correct in holding that the addition of Rs.53,26,567/- made by the Assessing Officer on the basis of the 18% of the project cost of Rs.19.43 crores

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M.R.ANANDARAM

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/176/2015HC Karnataka22 Jul 2022

Bench: P.S.DINESH KUMAR,C.M. POONACHA

Section 260

gains. 7. Opposing the appeals, Shri. A. Shankar, learned Senior Advocate submitted that: • though the lands were converted in 2004, assessees have not diverted the use of land but continued their agricultural operation. 4 Bangalore International Area Plan Approval Authority I.T.A Nos.176/2015, 520/2014, 175/2015, 177/2015, 178/2015, 179/2015, 298/2015 14 They have offered huge sums of income as 'agricultural income

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M.R.PRABHAVATHY

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/177/2015HC Karnataka22 Jul 2022

Bench: P.S.DINESH KUMAR,C.M. POONACHA

Section 260

gains. 7. Opposing the appeals, Shri. A. Shankar, learned Senior Advocate submitted that: • though the lands were converted in 2004, assessees have not diverted the use of land but continued their agricultural operation. 4 Bangalore International Area Plan Approval Authority I.T.A Nos.176/2015, 520/2014, 175/2015, 177/2015, 178/2015, 179/2015, 298/2015 14 They have offered huge sums of income as 'agricultural income

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME vs. M.R.PADMAVATHY TRUST

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/298/2015HC Karnataka22 Jul 2022

Bench: P.S.DINESH KUMAR,C.M. POONACHA

Section 260

gains. 7. Opposing the appeals, Shri. A. Shankar, learned Senior Advocate submitted that: • though the lands were converted in 2004, assessees have not diverted the use of land but continued their agricultural operation. 4 Bangalore International Area Plan Approval Authority I.T.A Nos.176/2015, 520/2014, 175/2015, 177/2015, 178/2015, 179/2015, 298/2015 14 They have offered huge sums of income as 'agricultural income

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME vs. SHRI. M.R. SEETHARAM

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/520/2014HC Karnataka22 Jul 2022

Bench: P.S.DINESH KUMAR,C.M. POONACHA

Section 260

gains. 7. Opposing the appeals, Shri. A. Shankar, learned Senior Advocate submitted that: • though the lands were converted in 2004, assessees have not diverted the use of land but continued their agricultural operation. 4 Bangalore International Area Plan Approval Authority I.T.A Nos.176/2015, 520/2014, 175/2015, 177/2015, 178/2015, 179/2015, 298/2015 14 They have offered huge sums of income as 'agricultural income

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M.R.KODANDARAM

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/175/2015HC Karnataka22 Jul 2022

Bench: P.S.DINESH KUMAR,C.M. POONACHA

Section 260

gains. 7. Opposing the appeals, Shri. A. Shankar, learned Senior Advocate submitted that: • though the lands were converted in 2004, assessees have not diverted the use of land but continued their agricultural operation. 4 Bangalore International Area Plan Approval Authority I.T.A Nos.176/2015, 520/2014, 175/2015, 177/2015, 178/2015, 179/2015, 298/2015 14 They have offered huge sums of income as 'agricultural income

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M.R.PATTABHIRAM

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/179/2015HC Karnataka22 Jul 2022

Bench: P.S.DINESH KUMAR,C.M. POONACHA

Section 260

gains. 7. Opposing the appeals, Shri. A. Shankar, learned Senior Advocate submitted that: • though the lands were converted in 2004, assessees have not diverted the use of land but continued their agricultural operation. 4 Bangalore International Area Plan Approval Authority I.T.A Nos.176/2015, 520/2014, 175/2015, 177/2015, 178/2015, 179/2015, 298/2015 14 They have offered huge sums of income as 'agricultural income

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III vs. M/S SYNDICATE BANK

The appeals are disposed of

ITA/256/2011HC Karnataka24 Jan 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,RAVI V HOSMANI

Section 260Section 260ASection 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)

Section 70(3) of the Act. An order was passed withdrawing an amount of Rs.51,06,737/- from long term capital loss and same has been taxed as short term capital gains

M/S FIDELITY BUSINESS SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/512/2017HC Karnataka23 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 2(22)(e)Section 254Section 260

gains arising to such shareholder or the holder of other specified securities, as the case may be, in the year in which such shares or other specified securities were purchased by the company. Explanation: For the purposes of this section, “specified securities” shall have the meaning assigned to it in Explanation to section 77A of the Companies

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI BERNARD MATHIAS PRABHU

ITA/290/2007HC Karnataka19 Nov 2013

Bench: N.KUMAR,RATHNAKALA

Section 2(13)Section 260

capital gains” instead of “income from business” includes adventure in the nature of trade vide Section 2(13) of the Income Tax Act?” 3 2. The assessee acquired a plot of land with an old house in it measuring 43.5 cents in Anegundi, Bijai, Mangalore on 19.12.1996 for a consideration of Rs.39,17,517/-. On the very same

M/S EMBASSY BRINDAVAN DEVELOPERS vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeal is allowed

ITA/713/2017HC Karnataka13 Sept 2022

Bench: P.S.DINESH KUMAR,UMESH M ADIGA

Section 260Section 263

gains tax. Adverting to Explanation 2(a) of Section 263 of the Act, he contended that jurisdiction under Section 263 could be invoked only in such cases where the order is passed without making inquiries or verification. In support of his contention, he placed reliance on CIT Vs. Gabriel India Ltd.1, CIT and another Vs. M/s. Cyber Park Development