BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

495 results for “capital gains”+ Section 5(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai8,175Delhi6,187Bangalore2,525Chennai2,492Kolkata1,935Ahmedabad1,844Jaipur1,205Hyderabad1,166Pune1,120Surat727Chandigarh641Indore560Karnataka495Cochin397Visakhapatnam392Raipur293Nagpur249Rajkot243Cuttack182Amritsar179Agra173Lucknow169Panaji123Calcutta112Guwahati111Telangana107SC100Patna93Ranchi90Dehradun89Jodhpur77Jabalpur69Allahabad36Varanasi25Kerala23Rajasthan11Punjab & Haryana10Orissa9A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Gauhati2Andhra Pradesh2Himachal Pradesh2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Section 260111Section 260A48Section 14847Capital Gains27Section 143(3)22Addition to Income21Section 14718Deduction17Section 143(2)15

SRI. P S SESHADRI. vs. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, this petition is allowed in part

WP/42424/2012HC Karnataka02 Jul 2013

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice Ram Mohan Reddy

Section 119(2)(c)Section 143Section 143(1)Section 154Section 234Section 234ASection 54E

Section 119(2)(c) of the Act extending the time limit for W.P.42424/12 4 investment in the ‘Capital Gains bonds’ upto 31.12.2006 without a ceiling limit and thereafter upto 31.3.2007 however imposing a maximum ceiling limit of Rs.50 lakhs, with retrospective effect from 01.03.2006. 3. Petitioner addressed a letter dated 30.8.2007 Annexure-H to the Commissioner of Income Tax setting

Showing 1–20 of 495 · Page 1 of 25

...
Section 54F14
Exemption14
Section 26313

M/S T T K PRESTIGE LTD vs. THE UNION OF INDIA REPTD BY ITS FINANCE SECRETARY

WP/26037/2005HC Karnataka06 Dec 2019

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice P.B. Bajanthri W.P. No.26037/2005 C/W W.P.No.4464/2007 & W.P.No.27087/2005(It)

Section 115

5, computed in the manner laid down in this Act. Section 2(24) of the Act defines 'Income'. The Act does not define the term 'Income' exhaustively but it provides inclusive definition. However, for the present purpose, attention is drawn to Clause (iii) of Section 2(24) of the Act, which provides that income includes the value of any perquisite

THE COMMR OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S DYNAMIC ENTERPRISE

The appeal stands dismissed

ITA/1414/2006HC Karnataka16 Sept 2013

Bench: This Bench.

Section 148Section 2(47)Section 45(4)

2. The substantial questions of law referred for our consideration are as under: “When a retiring partner takes only the money towards the value of his share, whether the firm should be made liable to pay capital gains even when there is no distribution of capital asset/assets among the partners under Section 45(4) of the I.T. Act? or Whether

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. ABB LTD

In the result, appeal stands dismissed

ITA/568/2015HC Karnataka04 Oct 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

Section 143Section 2(24)Section 220Section 220(2)Section 254Section 260Section 260ASection 45

gain on sale of “technical know-how” was is not capital in nature and it is also not chargeable to tax under Section 45 of the Act when the assessing authority rightly brought to tax as by holding that the consideration received by - 3 - assessee towards sale of technical know-how was capital in nature of goodwill which is liable

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. LATE KHOOBCHAND M MAKHIJA

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/496/2007HC Karnataka18 Dec 2013

Bench: N.KUMAR,RATHNAKALA

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 148Section 260Section 54(1)Section 54(2)

capital gains, when the Section contemplates exemption in respect of “a” house for the current assessment year? 2. Whether the Tribunal committed an error in holding that the assessee is entitled to the - 6 - benefit of exemption under Section 54(2) of the Act, insofar as the investment of Rs.1.70 crores in nationalized banks? 5

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S PRAKASH ELECTRIC COMPANY

ITA/884/2007HC Karnataka23 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260Section 47Section 47A

2) Where at any time, before the expiry of a period of three years from the date of the transfer of a capital asset referred to in clause (xi) of section 47, any of the shares allotted to the transferor in exchange of a membership in a recognized stock exchange are transferred, the amount of profits and gains not charged

KIDS CLINIC INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

COP/60/2015HC Karnataka21 Aug 2015

Bench: KRISHNA S DIXIT

Section 260Section 47Section 47A

2) Where at any time, before the expiry of a period of three years from the date of the transfer of a capital asset referred to in clause (xi) of section 47, any of the shares allotted to the transferor in exchange of a membership in a recognized stock exchange are transferred, the amount of profits and gains not charged

SRI N GOVINDARAJU vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

Appeal stands disposed of

ITA/504/2013HC Karnataka01 Jul 2015

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET SARAN

Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 45(2)

capital gains, and also disallowed 50% of expenses on transfer claimed by the assessee. Besides this, certain other disallowances were also made by the Assessing Officer. Challenging the same, the assessee filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), who granted certain relief, but confirmed the reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Act; the assessment

M/S WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/881/2008HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

Section 145A of the Income- tax Act which was inserted with effect from assessment year 1999-2000. The said provision states that the valuation of stock should include the amount of any tax duty, cess or fee - 94 - actually paid or incurred to bring the goods to its present location and condition. The Department has followed a consistent stand

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WIPRO LTD

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/211/2009HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

Section 145A of the Income- tax Act which was inserted with effect from assessment year 1999-2000. The said provision states that the valuation of stock should include the amount of any tax duty, cess or fee - 94 - actually paid or incurred to bring the goods to its present location and condition. The Department has followed a consistent stand

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.KURUHINSHETTY URBAN CO- OPERATIVE

In the result, the above questions are answered in favour

ITA/100036/2014HC Karnataka21 Sept 2015

Bench: ANAND BYRAREDDY,S.SUJATHA

Section 2Section 260ASection 5Section 56Section 80Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

2 (24 (vii a) of the IT Act, which requires the inclusion of profits and gains of any business of banking (including providing credit facilities) carried on by a co- operative society. Reference was made to the Explanation appended to Section 80 P (4) - which lays down that a co-operative bank and a primary agricultural credit society, shall have

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE MERCANTILE CO-OPERATIVE

In the result, the above questions are answered in favour

ITA/100110/2014HC Karnataka21 Sept 2015

Bench: ANAND BYRAREDDY,S.SUJATHA

Section 2Section 260ASection 5Section 56Section 80Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

2 (24 (vii a) of the IT Act, which requires the inclusion of profits and gains of any business of banking (including providing credit facilities) carried on by a co- operative society. Reference was made to the Explanation appended to Section 80 P (4) - which lays down that a co-operative bank and a primary agricultural credit society, shall have

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI MAHATAMA BASAVESHWARA

In the result, the above questions are answered in favour

ITA/100071/2014HC Karnataka21 Sept 2015

Bench: ANAND BYRAREDDY,S.SUJATHA

Section 2Section 260ASection 5Section 56Section 80Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

2 (24 (vii a) of the IT Act, which requires the inclusion of profits and gains of any business of banking (including providing credit facilities) carried on by a co- operative society. Reference was made to the Explanation appended to Section 80 P (4) - which lays down that a co-operative bank and a primary agricultural credit society, shall have

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. BEERESHWAR CREDIT SOUHARD SAHAKARI LTD.,

In the result, the above questions are answered in favour

ITA/100126/2014HC Karnataka21 Sept 2015

Bench: ANAND BYRAREDDY,S.SUJATHA

Section 2Section 260ASection 5Section 56Section 80Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

2 (24 (vii a) of the IT Act, which requires the inclusion of profits and gains of any business of banking (including providing credit facilities) carried on by a co- operative society. Reference was made to the Explanation appended to Section 80 P (4) - which lays down that a co-operative bank and a primary agricultural credit society, shall have

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE ATHANI CO-OPERATIVE

In the result, the above questions are answered in favour

ITA/100077/2014HC Karnataka21 Sept 2015

Bench: ANAND BYRAREDDY,S.SUJATHA

Section 2Section 260ASection 5Section 56Section 80Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

2 (24 (vii a) of the IT Act, which requires the inclusion of profits and gains of any business of banking (including providing credit facilities) carried on by a co- operative society. Reference was made to the Explanation appended to Section 80 P (4) - which lays down that a co-operative bank and a primary agricultural credit society, shall have

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI MAHALAXMI URBAN CO-OPERATIVE

In the result, the above questions are answered in favour

ITA/100081/2014HC Karnataka21 Sept 2015

Bench: ANAND BYRAREDDY,S.SUJATHA

Section 2Section 260ASection 5Section 56Section 80Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

2 (24 (vii a) of the IT Act, which requires the inclusion of profits and gains of any business of banking (including providing credit facilities) carried on by a co- operative society. Reference was made to the Explanation appended to Section 80 P (4) - which lays down that a co-operative bank and a primary agricultural credit society, shall have

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI MAHALAXMI URBAN CO-OPERATIVE

In the result, the above questions are answered in favour

ITA/100082/2014HC Karnataka21 Sept 2015

Bench: ANAND BYRAREDDY,S.SUJATHA

Section 2Section 260ASection 5Section 56Section 80Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

2 (24 (vii a) of the IT Act, which requires the inclusion of profits and gains of any business of banking (including providing credit facilities) carried on by a co- operative society. Reference was made to the Explanation appended to Section 80 P (4) - which lays down that a co-operative bank and a primary agricultural credit society, shall have

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.KURUHINSHETTY URBAN CO OPERATIVE

In the result, the above questions are answered in favour

ITA/100035/2014HC Karnataka21 Sept 2015

Bench: ANAND BYRAREDDY,S.SUJATHA

Section 2Section 260ASection 5Section 56Section 80Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

2 (24 (vii a) of the IT Act, which requires the inclusion of profits and gains of any business of banking (including providing credit facilities) carried on by a co- operative society. Reference was made to the Explanation appended to Section 80 P (4) - which lays down that a co-operative bank and a primary agricultural credit society, shall have

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI MAHATAMA BASAVESHWARA

In the result, the above questions are answered in favour

ITA/100072/2014HC Karnataka21 Sept 2015

Bench: ANAND BYRAREDDY,S.SUJATHA

Section 2Section 260ASection 5Section 56Section 80Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

2 (24 (vii a) of the IT Act, which requires the inclusion of profits and gains of any business of banking (including providing credit facilities) carried on by a co- operative society. Reference was made to the Explanation appended to Section 80 P (4) - which lays down that a co-operative bank and a primary agricultural credit society, shall have

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. CHIKODI TALUKA SHREE SARASWATI SOUHARD

In the result, the above questions are answered in favour

ITA/100095/2014HC Karnataka21 Sept 2015

Bench: ANAND BYRAREDDY,S.SUJATHA

Section 2Section 260ASection 5Section 56Section 80Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

2 (24 (vii a) of the IT Act, which requires the inclusion of profits and gains of any business of banking (including providing credit facilities) carried on by a co- operative society. Reference was made to the Explanation appended to Section 80 P (4) - which lays down that a co-operative bank and a primary agricultural credit society, shall have