SATISH N vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/30917/2016HC Karnataka10 Nov 2016
Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Raghvendra S. Chauhan
xviii), (xx), (xxv), (xxviii), (xxxii),
(xxxiii) of the Act, duly empowers the State to frame Rules for
different headings mentioned in the sub-sections aforementioned.
70
These different headings deal with different aspects of contract
carriages including a taxi. Hence, the Rules are intra vires the Act.
Fifthly, the learned counsel submit that while interpreting
the scope and ambit
