BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

121 results for “capital gains”+ Section 195clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai723Delhi612Bangalore346Chennai245Hyderabad128Ahmedabad124Karnataka121Jaipur119Kolkata114Pune59Chandigarh53Calcutta53Visakhapatnam40Indore34Cochin27Rajkot27Lucknow21Raipur20Nagpur18Cuttack16Guwahati11Dehradun10Telangana10Surat9SC7Agra6Varanasi5Allahabad3Amritsar3Panaji3Rajasthan2Jodhpur2Andhra Pradesh1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Jabalpur1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 26037Section 4010Section 10A6Section 106Section 260A4Section 1954Deduction4Depreciation4Disallowance4Section 119(2)(b)

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WIPRO LTD

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/211/2009HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

Section 145A of the Income- tax Act which was inserted with effect from assessment year 1999-2000. The said provision states that the valuation of stock should include the amount of any tax duty, cess or fee - 94 - actually paid or incurred to bring the goods to its present location and condition. The Department has followed a consistent stand

M/S WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/881/2008HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

Showing 1–20 of 121 · Page 1 of 7

3
Section 4332
TDS2

Section 145A of the Income- tax Act which was inserted with effect from assessment year 1999-2000. The said provision states that the valuation of stock should include the amount of any tax duty, cess or fee - 94 - actually paid or incurred to bring the goods to its present location and condition. The Department has followed a consistent stand

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 vs. M/S JEANS KNIT PVT LTD

In the result, we do not find any

ITA/580/2016HC Karnataka19 Oct 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 10Section 260Section 260A

Section except in respect of capital gains and share premium amount is not a capital gain earned. It is urged that since, the tribunal has failed to determine the core issue with regard to colorable devise adopted by the 15 assessee, to evade tax, therefore, the matter be remitted to the tribunal for decision afresh in accordance with

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S JEANS KNIT PVT LTD

In the result, we do not find any

ITA/559/2015HC Karnataka19 Oct 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 10Section 260Section 260A

Section except in respect of capital gains and share premium amount is not a capital gain earned. It is urged that since, the tribunal has failed to determine the core issue with regard to colorable devise adopted by the 15 assessee, to evade tax, therefore, the matter be remitted to the tribunal for decision afresh in accordance with

PR.COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S JEANS KNIT PVT.LTD

In the result, we do not find any

ITA/571/2016HC Karnataka19 Oct 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 10Section 260Section 260A

Section except in respect of capital gains and share premium amount is not a capital gain earned. It is urged that since, the tribunal has failed to determine the core issue with regard to colorable devise adopted by the 15 assessee, to evade tax, therefore, the matter be remitted to the tribunal for decision afresh in accordance with

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S URBAN LADDER HOME DECOR SOLUTIONS PVT LTD

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/11/2022HC Karnataka07 Feb 2025

Bench: V KAMESWAR RAO,S RACHAIAH

Section 260

gains derived from the alienation of any such right or property which are contingent on the productivity, use, or disposition thereof ; and (b) payments of any kind received as consideration for the use of, or the right to use, any industrial, commercial, or scientific equipment, other than payments derived by an enterprise described in paragraph 1 of Article 8 (Shipping

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7 vs. M/S TALLY SOLUTIONS PVT LTD

In the result, the appeals fail and are hereby

ITA/952/2017HC Karnataka16 Dec 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 195Section 260Section 40

195 of the Act on the aforesaid payment, therefore, disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act has rightly been made. It is also argued that Section 40 of the Act begins with a non obstante clause and has an overriding effect on Sections 3 to 38 of the Act and therefore, in case, any deduction is claimed under

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7 vs. M/S TALLY SOLUTIONS PVT LTD

In the result, the appeals fail and are hereby

ITA/951/2017HC Karnataka16 Dec 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 195Section 260Section 40

195 of the Act on the aforesaid payment, therefore, disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act has rightly been made. It is also argued that Section 40 of the Act begins with a non obstante clause and has an overriding effect on Sections 3 to 38 of the Act and therefore, in case, any deduction is claimed under

PR. COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S TALLY SOLUTIONS PVT LTD.,

In the result, the appeals fail and are hereby

ITA/199/2017HC Karnataka16 Dec 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 195Section 260Section 40

195 of the Act on the aforesaid payment, therefore, disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act has rightly been made. It is also argued that Section 40 of the Act begins with a non obstante clause and has an overriding effect on Sections 3 to 38 of the Act and therefore, in case, any deduction is claimed under

SMT. DR. SUDHA KRISHNASWAMY vs. CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

WP/15891/2016HC Karnataka27 Mar 2018

Bench: The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax

Section 119(2)(b)Section 195Section 54

capital gain of Rs.51,27,500/-. The assessee invested Rs.49,00,000/- in REC Bond claiming exemption under Section 54 EC of the Act. The assessee being non-resident, the purchaser of the property had deducted income tax as per provisions of Section 195

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S WIPRO LIMITED

In the result, the appeal is disposed of in terms

ITA/464/2017HC Karnataka09 Dec 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 10ASection 260Section 260ASection 32

195 of the Act. 7. It is also argued that since payment to non resident was in the nature of royalty in terms of Explanation 2 to Section 9(1)(vi) of the Act and no TDS 16 was deducted on the payment, therefore, disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act has rightly been made. It is also

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5 vs. M/S. PUMA SPORTS INDIA P., LTD.,

The appeal stands dismissed

ITA/223/2018HC Karnataka12 Mar 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,V SRISHANANDA

Section 143(3)Section 144Section 260Section 40Section 5(2)(b)Section 9(1)(i)Section 92C

capital importing countries, that is, developing nations. Here comes the principle of nexus, for the nexus of the right to tax is in the source rule. It is founded on the right of a country to tax the income earned from a source located in the said State, irrespective of the country of the residence of the recipient

M/S ARASOR CORPORATION vs. M/S XALTED INFORMATION SYSTEMS PVT LTD

COP/66/2010HC Karnataka28 Jul 2015

Bench: ANAND BYRAREDDY

Section 433Section 434Section 439

capital stock; provided, however, that subsection (i) of this section shall not apply to nonstock corporations. 29 8 Del. C. 1953, § 312; 56 Del. Laws, c.50; 59 Del. Laws, c. 106, § 16; 64 Del. Laws, c. 112, § 56; 66 Del. Laws, c. 352, §11; 68 Del. Laws, c. 163, § 2; 70 Del. Laws, c. 587, § 29, 30; 73 Del. Laws

DR SWAMY MANJUNATH S T vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/46917/2018HC Karnataka21 Dec 2018

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

195 68TH CROSS, 5TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR BANGALORE - 560010 10. DR SHRUTHI T S D/O SHIVALINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS RESIDING AT THOTAHALI VILLAGE SATHANUR HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGAR DISTRICT - 562117 11. DR SHIVARANJINI D/O LATE VERAIAH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS ADDRESS HULLEKERE BEVINAHALLI POST, MANDYA - 571401 3 12. DR IDRIS KAMRAN S/O ASHFAQUE AHMED WAHEED AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS RESIDING

DR PRESTEENA MATHEW vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/47256/2018HC Karnataka21 Dec 2018

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

195 68TH CROSS, 5TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR BANGALORE - 560010 10. DR SHRUTHI T S D/O SHIVALINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS RESIDING AT THOTAHALI VILLAGE SATHANUR HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGAR DISTRICT - 562117 11. DR SHIVARANJINI D/O LATE VERAIAH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS ADDRESS HULLEKERE BEVINAHALLI POST, MANDYA - 571401 3 12. DR IDRIS KAMRAN S/O ASHFAQUE AHMED WAHEED AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS RESIDING

DR. MADHAVA. M. vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/52140/2018HC Karnataka21 Dec 2018

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

195 68TH CROSS, 5TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR BANGALORE - 560010 10. DR SHRUTHI T S D/O SHIVALINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS RESIDING AT THOTAHALI VILLAGE SATHANUR HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGAR DISTRICT - 562117 11. DR SHIVARANJINI D/O LATE VERAIAH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS ADDRESS HULLEKERE BEVINAHALLI POST, MANDYA - 571401 3 12. DR IDRIS KAMRAN S/O ASHFAQUE AHMED WAHEED AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS RESIDING

DR ARJUN KALASAPUR vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/45738/2018HC Karnataka21 Dec 2018

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

195 68TH CROSS, 5TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR BANGALORE - 560010 10. DR SHRUTHI T S D/O SHIVALINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS RESIDING AT THOTAHALI VILLAGE SATHANUR HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGAR DISTRICT - 562117 11. DR SHIVARANJINI D/O LATE VERAIAH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS ADDRESS HULLEKERE BEVINAHALLI POST, MANDYA - 571401 3 12. DR IDRIS KAMRAN S/O ASHFAQUE AHMED WAHEED AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS RESIDING

DR SHARATH B RAJU vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/46335/2018HC Karnataka21 Dec 2018

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

195 68TH CROSS, 5TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR BANGALORE - 560010 10. DR SHRUTHI T S D/O SHIVALINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS RESIDING AT THOTAHALI VILLAGE SATHANUR HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGAR DISTRICT - 562117 11. DR SHIVARANJINI D/O LATE VERAIAH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS ADDRESS HULLEKERE BEVINAHALLI POST, MANDYA - 571401 3 12. DR IDRIS KAMRAN S/O ASHFAQUE AHMED WAHEED AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS RESIDING

SMT. M R PRABHAVATHY vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

WTA/1/2019HC Karnataka04 Mar 2020

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice K.Natarajan Election Petition No.1 Of 2019 Connected With Election Petition No.2 Of 2019

Section 81

gainful employment except his influence in political background of his grand father, father, uncle, whereas the respondent No.2 - A.Manju is a qualified law graduate and Ex-Minister and Ex-member of various organization was contested and succeeded against JDS. The BJP had expected the Hassan constituency to be the winning constituency. The respondent No.1 while filing his nomination

R JANARDHANA BABU vs. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

Accordingly, the writ petitions are allowed

WP/37528/2010HC Karnataka07 Jul 2017

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice B. Veerappa

195. S Lawrence, s/o Susainathan, aged about 59 years, Working as pharma Assistant, Glaxosmithkline Pharmaceuticals Limited, Devanahalli Road, Off Old Madras Road, Bangalore-560049 196. M A Srishaila, d/o M A Narayana Iyengar, aged about 57 years, Working as pharma Assistant, Glaxosmithkline Pharmaceuticals Limited, Devanahalli Road, Off Old Madras Road, 57 Bangalore-560049 197. J Robert Thomas, s/o James, aged