BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

115 results for “capital gains”+ Section 184(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi290Mumbai254Bangalore168Karnataka115Jaipur104Ahmedabad73Hyderabad72Chandigarh62Chennai50Kolkata46Raipur42Surat40Indore25Pune21Amritsar20Calcutta17Lucknow14SC6Cuttack6Varanasi6Guwahati6Telangana5Agra4Cochin4Rajasthan4Visakhapatnam4Rajkot3Panaji1Jabalpur1Dehradun1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 26014Section 260A8Capital Gains3Deduction3Section 812

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WIPRO LTD

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/211/2009HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

Section 145A of the Income- tax Act which was inserted with effect from assessment year 1999-2000. The said provision states that the valuation of stock should include the amount of any tax duty, cess or fee - 94 - actually paid or incurred to bring the goods to its present location and condition. The Department has followed a consistent stand

M/S WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/881/2008HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

Showing 1–20 of 115 · Page 1 of 6

Section 145A of the Income- tax Act which was inserted with effect from assessment year 1999-2000. The said provision states that the valuation of stock should include the amount of any tax duty, cess or fee - 94 - actually paid or incurred to bring the goods to its present location and condition. The Department has followed a consistent stand

M/S HMA DATA SYSTEM P LTD., vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/684/2009HC Karnataka26 Jun 2015

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR

Section 260A

5 loss account in respect of the value of the shares for each assessment year from the date of purchase i.e., assessment year 1992-93? (ii) Whether the Appellate Authorities were correct in not taking into consideration the fact that the assessee had claimed travel expenditure, professional charges and other expenses in connection with sale of M/s.Diebold

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S HMA DATA SYSTEMS P LTD.,

ITA/700/2009HC Karnataka26 Jun 2015

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR

Section 260A

5 loss account in respect of the value of the shares for each assessment year from the date of purchase i.e., assessment year 1992-93? (ii) Whether the Appellate Authorities were correct in not taking into consideration the fact that the assessee had claimed travel expenditure, professional charges and other expenses in connection with sale of M/s.Diebold

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.GAYATHRI ENTERPRISES

ITA/274/2004HC Karnataka04 Jul 2012

Bench: B.MANOHAR,D.V.SHYLENDRA KUMAR

Section 260Section 260ASection 45

5. A few undisputed facts as can be inferred from the records are that partnership firm by name Gayathri Enterprises came to be formed by the joining together of as many as seven partners as on 19.5.1980. It appears while three minors were admitted to the benefit of the partnership firm and later the company by name M/s. ASK Brothers

MASTER BALACHANDAR KRISHNAN vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/8788/2020HC Karnataka29 Sept 2020

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,RAVI V HOSMANI

Section 8 of the Act provides for the authorities of the School which are five in number. Section 18 of the Act which deals with authorities and Officers of the School etc., states that the authorities of the School and their composition, powers, functions and other matters relating to them, the officers of the School and their appointment, powers, functions

SATISH N vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/30917/2016HC Karnataka10 Nov 2016

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Raghvendra S. Chauhan

Section 93 of the Act, namely "a canvasser…solicits the customer for such vehicle (public service vehicle) ”. Therefore, an aggregator is covered under Section 93 of the Act. 53. Of course, Mr. Sajan Poovayya, the learned Senior counsel, has argued that an aggregator does not go on to the road to solicit customers. But in the Digital Age, the internet

DR PRESTEENA MATHEW vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/47256/2018HC Karnataka21 Dec 2018

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

184. DR MANJUNATHA S B S/O BEERAIAH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT NO.S M PALYA, HULIYAR C N HALLI, TUMKUR, KARNATAKA-572218 185. DR SWETHA O N D/O ONKARAPPA N P AGEDA BOUT 29 YEARS R/AT 704, MULLER NEST FATHER MULLER DOCTORS QUARTERS JAPPU, KANKANADY MANGALORE-575002 186. DR KONDA MITHUNESHWAR REDDY S/O K PRABHAKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS

DR SWAMY MANJUNATH S T vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/46917/2018HC Karnataka21 Dec 2018

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

184. DR MANJUNATHA S B S/O BEERAIAH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT NO.S M PALYA, HULIYAR C N HALLI, TUMKUR, KARNATAKA-572218 185. DR SWETHA O N D/O ONKARAPPA N P AGEDA BOUT 29 YEARS R/AT 704, MULLER NEST FATHER MULLER DOCTORS QUARTERS JAPPU, KANKANADY MANGALORE-575002 186. DR KONDA MITHUNESHWAR REDDY S/O K PRABHAKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS

DR ARJUN KALASAPUR vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/45738/2018HC Karnataka21 Dec 2018

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

184. DR MANJUNATHA S B S/O BEERAIAH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT NO.S M PALYA, HULIYAR C N HALLI, TUMKUR, KARNATAKA-572218 185. DR SWETHA O N D/O ONKARAPPA N P AGEDA BOUT 29 YEARS R/AT 704, MULLER NEST FATHER MULLER DOCTORS QUARTERS JAPPU, KANKANADY MANGALORE-575002 186. DR KONDA MITHUNESHWAR REDDY S/O K PRABHAKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS

DR. MADHAVA. M. vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/52140/2018HC Karnataka21 Dec 2018

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

184. DR MANJUNATHA S B S/O BEERAIAH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT NO.S M PALYA, HULIYAR C N HALLI, TUMKUR, KARNATAKA-572218 185. DR SWETHA O N D/O ONKARAPPA N P AGEDA BOUT 29 YEARS R/AT 704, MULLER NEST FATHER MULLER DOCTORS QUARTERS JAPPU, KANKANADY MANGALORE-575002 186. DR KONDA MITHUNESHWAR REDDY S/O K PRABHAKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS

DR SHARATH B RAJU vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/46335/2018HC Karnataka21 Dec 2018

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

184. DR MANJUNATHA S B S/O BEERAIAH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT NO.S M PALYA, HULIYAR C N HALLI, TUMKUR, KARNATAKA-572218 185. DR SWETHA O N D/O ONKARAPPA N P AGEDA BOUT 29 YEARS R/AT 704, MULLER NEST FATHER MULLER DOCTORS QUARTERS JAPPU, KANKANADY MANGALORE-575002 186. DR KONDA MITHUNESHWAR REDDY S/O K PRABHAKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS

SMT. M R PRABHAVATHY vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

WTA/1/2019HC Karnataka04 Mar 2020

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice K.Natarajan Election Petition No.1 Of 2019 Connected With Election Petition No.2 Of 2019

Section 81

gainful employment except his influence in political background of his grand father, father, uncle, whereas the respondent No.2 - A.Manju is a qualified law graduate and Ex-Minister and Ex-member of various organization was contested and succeeded against JDS. The BJP had expected the Hassan constituency to be the winning constituency. The respondent No.1 while filing his nomination

COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX vs. OHIO UNIVERSITY CHRIST COLLEGE

ITA/312/2016HC Karnataka17 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 11Section 12ASection 260

5 years from the year of incurring of expenditure. The fact of amortization was not disputed by the Assessing Officer in the assessment proceedings for Assessment Year 2007-08 where the entire amount was added back Date of Judgment: 17.07.2018 in ITA Nos.312 & 313 of 2016 Commissioner of Income-tax & another vs. Ohio University Christ College 35/47 claiming 1/5th

SMT. V.KRISHNAMMA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/36324/2017HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

SECTIONS 2, 7, 11, 20 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING AND PROHIBITION ACT OF 2011 AS VOID, ARBITRARY, UNJUST AS THEY ARE VIOLATIVE OF PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. IN W.P. NO.22817/2018: BETWEEN: SRI. MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O LATE GOVINDAPPA R/AT H. THIMMAPURA VILLAGE 122 BELENHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 228. ...PETITIONER

S B JAGADEESH vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/51160/2017HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

SECTIONS 2, 7, 11, 20 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING AND PROHIBITION ACT OF 2011 AS VOID, ARBITRARY, UNJUST AS THEY ARE VIOLATIVE OF PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. IN W.P. NO.22817/2018: BETWEEN: SRI. MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O LATE GOVINDAPPA R/AT H. THIMMAPURA VILLAGE 122 BELENHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 228. ...PETITIONER

RAMA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/27625/2019HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

SECTIONS 2, 7, 11, 20 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING AND PROHIBITION ACT OF 2011 AS VOID, ARBITRARY, UNJUST AS THEY ARE VIOLATIVE OF PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. IN W.P. NO.22817/2018: BETWEEN: SRI. MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O LATE GOVINDAPPA R/AT H. THIMMAPURA VILLAGE 122 BELENHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 228. ...PETITIONER

P. D. PONNAPPA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/12975/2019HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

SECTIONS 2, 7, 11, 20 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING AND PROHIBITION ACT OF 2011 AS VOID, ARBITRARY, UNJUST AS THEY ARE VIOLATIVE OF PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. IN W.P. NO.22817/2018: BETWEEN: SRI. MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O LATE GOVINDAPPA R/AT H. THIMMAPURA VILLAGE 122 BELENHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 228. ...PETITIONER

RAJAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/50955/2019HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

SECTIONS 2, 7, 11, 20 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING AND PROHIBITION ACT OF 2011 AS VOID, ARBITRARY, UNJUST AS THEY ARE VIOLATIVE OF PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. IN W.P. NO.22817/2018: BETWEEN: SRI. MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O LATE GOVINDAPPA R/AT H. THIMMAPURA VILLAGE 122 BELENHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 228. ...PETITIONER

MR C V MANJUNATHA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/235/2018HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

SECTIONS 2, 7, 11, 20 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING AND PROHIBITION ACT OF 2011 AS VOID, ARBITRARY, UNJUST AS THEY ARE VIOLATIVE OF PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. IN W.P. NO.22817/2018: BETWEEN: SRI. MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O LATE GOVINDAPPA R/AT H. THIMMAPURA VILLAGE 122 BELENHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 228. ...PETITIONER