BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

114 results for “capital gains”+ Section 104clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai636Delhi475Bangalore239Ahmedabad211Chennai138Chandigarh134Jaipur120Karnataka114Kolkata72Pune70Cochin66Agra64Hyderabad57Calcutta53Raipur51Indore37Nagpur24Surat20Lucknow17Cuttack15Guwahati13Visakhapatnam11SC11Jodhpur7Patna6Dehradun5Telangana5Rajkot5Rajasthan4Amritsar2Allahabad2Andhra Pradesh1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 26013Section 260A4Section 373Section 4332Section 812Section 112

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.GAYATHRI ENTERPRISES

ITA/274/2004HC Karnataka04 Jul 2012

Bench: B.MANOHAR,D.V.SHYLENDRA KUMAR

Section 260Section 260ASection 45

104) R.V. LAYOUT, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE … CROSS OBJECTOR [BY SRI A SHANKAR & SRI M LAVA, ADVS.] AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, C.R.BUILDING QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1) C.R.BUILDINGS, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE – 560 001 … RESPONDENTS [BY SRI M V SESHACHALA, ADV.] THIS ITA CROB IS FILED UNDER SECTION

M/S WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/881/2008HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Showing 1–20 of 114 · Page 1 of 6

Section 260

Section 145A of the Income- tax Act which was inserted with effect from assessment year 1999-2000. The said provision states that the valuation of stock should include the amount of any tax duty, cess or fee - 94 - actually paid or incurred to bring the goods to its present location and condition. The Department has followed a consistent stand

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WIPRO LTD

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/211/2009HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

Section 145A of the Income- tax Act which was inserted with effect from assessment year 1999-2000. The said provision states that the valuation of stock should include the amount of any tax duty, cess or fee - 94 - actually paid or incurred to bring the goods to its present location and condition. The Department has followed a consistent stand

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. DR T.M.A. PAI FOUNDATION

ITA/243/2010HC Karnataka14 Aug 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 11Section 260Section 32

104 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.S PARTHASARATHI & SMT.SHEETAL BORKAR, ADVS.) ***** THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260- A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, WITH A PRAYER TO I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN II.TO Date of Judgment 14-08-2018 I.T.A.No.243/2010 Commissioner of Income Tax & Another Vs. Dr.T.M.A.Pai Foundation 2/21 ALLOW THE APPEAL AND TO PASS

DR SWAMY MANJUNATH S T vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/46917/2018HC Karnataka21 Dec 2018

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

104. DR NIKITA K JAIN D/O KAILASH CHAND JAIN AGED 26 YEARS ASHIRWAD NO 4-5 WEST LINK ROAD, 3RD CROSS, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE - 560003 105. DR SNEHA PRIYA PRABHAKAR D/O MITHAIAH PRABHARKAR AGED 28 YEARS NO 59 KAMAL PANDURANGANAGAR OPP HDFC AREKERE BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560007 106. DR ANGEL CHAM PHILIP D/O P M PHILIPOSE AGED 29 YEARS MALATHARAYIL HOUSE

DR ARJUN KALASAPUR vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/45738/2018HC Karnataka21 Dec 2018

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

104. DR NIKITA K JAIN D/O KAILASH CHAND JAIN AGED 26 YEARS ASHIRWAD NO 4-5 WEST LINK ROAD, 3RD CROSS, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE - 560003 105. DR SNEHA PRIYA PRABHAKAR D/O MITHAIAH PRABHARKAR AGED 28 YEARS NO 59 KAMAL PANDURANGANAGAR OPP HDFC AREKERE BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560007 106. DR ANGEL CHAM PHILIP D/O P M PHILIPOSE AGED 29 YEARS MALATHARAYIL HOUSE

DR. MADHAVA. M. vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/52140/2018HC Karnataka21 Dec 2018

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

104. DR NIKITA K JAIN D/O KAILASH CHAND JAIN AGED 26 YEARS ASHIRWAD NO 4-5 WEST LINK ROAD, 3RD CROSS, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE - 560003 105. DR SNEHA PRIYA PRABHAKAR D/O MITHAIAH PRABHARKAR AGED 28 YEARS NO 59 KAMAL PANDURANGANAGAR OPP HDFC AREKERE BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560007 106. DR ANGEL CHAM PHILIP D/O P M PHILIPOSE AGED 29 YEARS MALATHARAYIL HOUSE

DR PRESTEENA MATHEW vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/47256/2018HC Karnataka21 Dec 2018

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

104. DR NIKITA K JAIN D/O KAILASH CHAND JAIN AGED 26 YEARS ASHIRWAD NO 4-5 WEST LINK ROAD, 3RD CROSS, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE - 560003 105. DR SNEHA PRIYA PRABHAKAR D/O MITHAIAH PRABHARKAR AGED 28 YEARS NO 59 KAMAL PANDURANGANAGAR OPP HDFC AREKERE BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560007 106. DR ANGEL CHAM PHILIP D/O P M PHILIPOSE AGED 29 YEARS MALATHARAYIL HOUSE

DR SHARATH B RAJU vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/46335/2018HC Karnataka21 Dec 2018

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

104. DR NIKITA K JAIN D/O KAILASH CHAND JAIN AGED 26 YEARS ASHIRWAD NO 4-5 WEST LINK ROAD, 3RD CROSS, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE - 560003 105. DR SNEHA PRIYA PRABHAKAR D/O MITHAIAH PRABHARKAR AGED 28 YEARS NO 59 KAMAL PANDURANGANAGAR OPP HDFC AREKERE BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560007 106. DR ANGEL CHAM PHILIP D/O P M PHILIPOSE AGED 29 YEARS MALATHARAYIL HOUSE

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX vs. M/S BIOCON LTD.,

In the result, we do not find any merit in this

ITA/653/2013HC Karnataka11 Nov 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 260Section 260ASection 37

gains' of business'?. The Special bench of the tribunal by an order dated 16.07.2013 while answering the reference inter alia held different amount of between the market value and the face value at which shares are allotted are part of remuneration, which are paid to the employees in order to compensate them for the continuity of their services

M/S ARASOR CORPORATION vs. M/S XALTED INFORMATION SYSTEMS PVT LTD

COP/66/2010HC Karnataka28 Jul 2015

Bench: ANAND BYRAREDDY

Section 433Section 434Section 439

capital stock; provided, however, that subsection (i) of this section shall not apply to nonstock corporations. 29 8 Del. C. 1953, § 312; 56 Del. Laws, c.50; 59 Del. Laws, c. 106, § 16; 64 Del. Laws, c. 112, § 56; 66 Del. Laws, c. 352, §11; 68 Del. Laws, c. 163, § 2; 70 Del. Laws, c. 587, § 29, 30; 73 Del. Laws

R JANARDHANA BABU vs. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

Accordingly, the writ petitions are allowed

WP/37528/2010HC Karnataka07 Jul 2017

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice B. Veerappa

capital, but the workman should also be entitled to participate in it. 103 11. Learned senior counsel for the petitioners relied upon the following judgments with regard to “Transfer was malafide”: (i) The Judgment of the Bombay High Court in the case of STANDARD CHARTERED BANK LIMITED, MUMBAI .vs. GRINDLAYS BANK EMPLOYEES UNION, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER reported

SMT. M R PRABHAVATHY vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

WTA/1/2019HC Karnataka04 Mar 2020

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice K.Natarajan Election Petition No.1 Of 2019 Connected With Election Petition No.2 Of 2019

Section 81

gainful employment except his influence in political background of his grand father, father, uncle, whereas the respondent No.2 - A.Manju is a qualified law graduate and Ex-Minister and Ex-member of various organization was contested and succeeded against JDS. The BJP had expected the Hassan constituency to be the winning constituency. The respondent No.1 while filing his nomination

BORALINGAIAH vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/33339/2018HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

SECTIONS 2, 7, 11, 20 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING AND PROHIBITION ACT OF 2011 AS VOID, ARBITRARY, UNJUST AS THEY ARE VIOLATIVE OF PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. IN W.P. NO.22817/2018: BETWEEN: SRI. MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O LATE GOVINDAPPA R/AT H. THIMMAPURA VILLAGE 122 BELENHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 228. ...PETITIONER

SRI SANJAY JAYARAM vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/15270/2018HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

SECTIONS 2, 7, 11, 20 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING AND PROHIBITION ACT OF 2011 AS VOID, ARBITRARY, UNJUST AS THEY ARE VIOLATIVE OF PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. IN W.P. NO.22817/2018: BETWEEN: SRI. MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O LATE GOVINDAPPA R/AT H. THIMMAPURA VILLAGE 122 BELENHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 228. ...PETITIONER

RAMA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/27625/2019HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

SECTIONS 2, 7, 11, 20 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING AND PROHIBITION ACT OF 2011 AS VOID, ARBITRARY, UNJUST AS THEY ARE VIOLATIVE OF PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. IN W.P. NO.22817/2018: BETWEEN: SRI. MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O LATE GOVINDAPPA R/AT H. THIMMAPURA VILLAGE 122 BELENHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 228. ...PETITIONER

SRI SANTOSH A SHETTY vs. THE STATE OF KARANTAKA

WP/29668/2019HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

SECTIONS 2, 7, 11, 20 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING AND PROHIBITION ACT OF 2011 AS VOID, ARBITRARY, UNJUST AS THEY ARE VIOLATIVE OF PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. IN W.P. NO.22817/2018: BETWEEN: SRI. MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O LATE GOVINDAPPA R/AT H. THIMMAPURA VILLAGE 122 BELENHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 228. ...PETITIONER

SRI. GURUPRASAD vs. GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

WP/8176/2019HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

SECTIONS 2, 7, 11, 20 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING AND PROHIBITION ACT OF 2011 AS VOID, ARBITRARY, UNJUST AS THEY ARE VIOLATIVE OF PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. IN W.P. NO.22817/2018: BETWEEN: SRI. MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O LATE GOVINDAPPA R/AT H. THIMMAPURA VILLAGE 122 BELENHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 228. ...PETITIONER

MR C V MANJUNATHA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/235/2018HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

SECTIONS 2, 7, 11, 20 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING AND PROHIBITION ACT OF 2011 AS VOID, ARBITRARY, UNJUST AS THEY ARE VIOLATIVE OF PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. IN W.P. NO.22817/2018: BETWEEN: SRI. MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O LATE GOVINDAPPA R/AT H. THIMMAPURA VILLAGE 122 BELENHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 228. ...PETITIONER

RAJAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/50955/2019HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

SECTIONS 2, 7, 11, 20 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING AND PROHIBITION ACT OF 2011 AS VOID, ARBITRARY, UNJUST AS THEY ARE VIOLATIVE OF PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. IN W.P. NO.22817/2018: BETWEEN: SRI. MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O LATE GOVINDAPPA R/AT H. THIMMAPURA VILLAGE 122 BELENHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 228. ...PETITIONER