BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 153A(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai965Delhi822Jaipur278Bangalore180Chennai164Hyderabad111Chandigarh100Pune64Kolkata61Cochin59Visakhapatnam52Nagpur40Amritsar39Ahmedabad34Guwahati31Surat30Allahabad29Indore28Raipur22Rajkot16Agra14Jodhpur13Lucknow13Ranchi10Patna9Dehradun5Karnataka5Jabalpur3Cuttack1Gauhati1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 26030Section 14810Section 139(1)5Section 1535Revision u/s 2635

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. S.MADHAVA, M/S BELLARY STEEL ROLING MILLS,

The appeals are allowed

ITA/5035/2009HC Karnataka13 Aug 2012

Bench: N.KUMAR,H.S.KEMPANNA

Section 139(1)Section 148Section 153Section 260

1,28,48,42,890/- by making a declaration of diamonds valued at `36,87,47,758/- and paying the tax on a flat rate of 30% on the VDIS declaration. After taking note of the declaration of cash in the VDIS 1997 by the assessee group, he held that the assessee has merely followed a circuitous method of transferring

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. S.MADHAVA, M/S BELLARY STEEL ROLING MILLS,

The appeals are allowed

ITA/5034/2009
HC Karnataka
13 Aug 2012

Bench: N.KUMAR,H.S.KEMPANNA

Section 139(1)Section 148Section 153Section 260

1,28,48,42,890/- by making a declaration of diamonds valued at `36,87,47,758/- and paying the tax on a flat rate of 30% on the VDIS declaration. After taking note of the declaration of cash in the VDIS 1997 by the assessee group, he held that the assessee has merely followed a circuitous method of transferring

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. S.MADHAVA (HUF)

The appeals are allowed

ITA/5036/2009HC Karnataka13 Aug 2012

Bench: N.KUMAR,H.S.KEMPANNA

Section 139(1)Section 148Section 153Section 260

1,28,48,42,890/- by making a declaration of diamonds valued at `36,87,47,758/- and paying the tax on a flat rate of 30% on the VDIS declaration. After taking note of the declaration of cash in the VDIS 1997 by the assessee group, he held that the assessee has merely followed a circuitous method of transferring

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. S.MADHAVA (HUF)

The appeals are allowed

ITA/5038/2009HC Karnataka13 Aug 2012

Bench: N.KUMAR,H.S.KEMPANNA

Section 139(1)Section 148Section 153Section 260

1,28,48,42,890/- by making a declaration of diamonds valued at `36,87,47,758/- and paying the tax on a flat rate of 30% on the VDIS declaration. After taking note of the declaration of cash in the VDIS 1997 by the assessee group, he held that the assessee has merely followed a circuitous method of transferring

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. S.PARVATHI MADHAVA

The appeals are allowed

ITA/5037/2009HC Karnataka13 Aug 2012

Bench: N.KUMAR,H.S.KEMPANNA

Section 139(1)Section 148Section 153Section 260

1,28,48,42,890/- by making a declaration of diamonds valued at `36,87,47,758/- and paying the tax on a flat rate of 30% on the VDIS declaration. After taking note of the declaration of cash in the VDIS 1997 by the assessee group, he held that the assessee has merely followed a circuitous method of transferring