BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ TP Methodclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore345Mumbai342Delhi307Chennai117Kolkata52Hyderabad34Ahmedabad22Pune20Chandigarh14Jaipur6Karnataka4Rajkot4Visakhapatnam3Indore3Cuttack2Kerala1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 260A7Section 1943Section 2602Section 402Section 206A2Section 80J2Section 143(3)2Section 92A2TDS2Transfer Pricing

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S VODAFONE SOUTH LTD

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/699/2015HC Karnataka28 Jul 2016

Bench: S.N.SATYANARAYANA,JAYANT PATEL

Section 260A

methods used in science and industry.’ The work technical is derived from the word technique which means ‘a particular or a special way of doing something. He further described how roaming services is technical services, which is reproduced as under “If the subscriber of Rajasthan Circle goes to Maharashtra when he reaches Maharashtra, the network of Maharashtra catches signals from

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INDIA PVT LTD

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/141/2020HC Karnataka21 Apr 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

Section 143(2)
2
Disallowance2
Addition to Income2
Section 194
Section 2
Section 206A
Section 40
Section 80J

TP)A No.149/Bang/2014 for the assessment year 2008-2009 and seeking to confirm the order passed by the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, LTU, Bangalore. 10. The above appeals were admitted on 8.10.2020 and the following substantial questions of law were formulated: “1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER vs. M/S OBULAPURAM MINING

ITA/100012/2017HC Karnataka17 Mar 2023

Bench: K.SOMASHEKAR,UMESH M ADIGA

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(13)Section 260ASection 37(1)Section 92ASection 92C

TDS, stated that they have not rendered any services to the assessee. It was found that some of them never owned any transportation vehicles and some of them did not have any means. Further, some of the vehicles were not transport vehicles but were autos, scooters, ambulances and school buses etc. However, on an examination of the bank accounts

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. ADC INDIA COMMUNICATIONS LTD

The appeal is disposed of with liberty as prayed for by the learned

ITA/494/2022HC Karnataka30 Sept 2024

Bench: S.G.PANDIT,C.M. POONACHA

Section 260Section 40Section 40A(7)Section 9(1)(vii)

TP)A.No.79/Bang/2016 for the assessment year 2011- 12, raising the following substantial questions of law: - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:41506-DB ITA No. 494 of 2022 “1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law include/exclude comparable’s namely, M/s. Dynalog (India) Ltd & M/s. Spanco Limited on the ground that