BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

119 results for “TDS”+ Section 91clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,219Mumbai1,142Bangalore527Chennai377Kolkata293Hyderabad169Indore167Ahmedabad147Jaipur127Karnataka119Chandigarh110Cochin69Pune63Raipur48Surat45Cuttack36Visakhapatnam35Rajkot31Lucknow29Nagpur26Guwahati22Jodhpur22Ranchi21Kerala18Patna18Agra16Telangana11Varanasi8Allahabad6Jabalpur6Dehradun6Amritsar5SC2Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 234E84Section 26027TDS24Section 153C4Section 1444Section 260A3Section 1322Section 143(3)2Section 153D2Deduction

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WIPRO LTD

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/211/2009HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

TDS of Rs.6,02,14,066/- and advance tax payment of Rs.59,50,80,000/-. The assessee claimed refund of Rs.17,12,21,725/-. The return of income was processed u/s 143(1) on 31.01.2005 and the case was selected for scrutiny and notice u/s 143(2) was issued on 14.02.2005. A questionnaire was issued on 27.04.2006 calling for certain

M/S WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/881/2008HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

Showing 1–20 of 119 · Page 1 of 6

2

TDS of Rs.6,02,14,066/- and advance tax payment of Rs.59,50,80,000/-. The assessee claimed refund of Rs.17,12,21,725/-. The return of income was processed u/s 143(1) on 31.01.2005 and the case was selected for scrutiny and notice u/s 143(2) was issued on 14.02.2005. A questionnaire was issued on 27.04.2006 calling for certain

CENTRAL POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/15476/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

M/S HOTEL FISHLAND vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/12097/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

M/S TEE ENN ENTERPRISES vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/19762/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

SRI CHANDRAKAR K KAMATH vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

WP/23541/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

M/S TEACHERS CO OPERATIVE BANK vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/16939/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

M/S NEW MEDIA COMPANY vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/13065/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

DR V. NARAYANASWAMY vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/10243/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

M/S NEW MEDIA COMPANY vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/18788/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

MINTENT SERVICED APARTMENTS PVT LTD., vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/25841/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

M/S PRAKASH BUS CORPORATION PVT LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

WP/37689/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

ECOLE SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/14669/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

SRI. FATHERAJ SINGHVI vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/41614/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

M/S MAHRISHI MELTCHEMS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/53286/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

M/S. LAKSHMINIRMAN BANGALORE PVT.LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

WP/26589/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

SREE C B EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL TRUST vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/38127/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

M/S. K K BROTHERS vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/3725/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

M/S PRODIGY TECHNOVATIONS PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/11889/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

M/S PROCESS PUMPS (I) PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/14296/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section