BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “TDS”+ Section 80Pclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai148Bangalore62Pune35Raipur30Delhi27Chennai24Ahmedabad23Kolkata21Visakhapatnam19Cochin14Jaipur12Surat10Nagpur9Lucknow9Karnataka6Jodhpur4Jabalpur4Chandigarh3Panaji2Indore2Amritsar1Kerala1Hyderabad1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 26010Section 260A8Section 80P6Section 9(1)(vi)3Section 1943Addition to Income3Section 1952Section 206A2Section 80J2Deduction

SRI.BAPOOJI PATTIN SOUHARD vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER

Appeal is dismissed confirming the order passed by the

ITA/100015/2018HC Karnataka10 Oct 2018

Bench: H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD,B.VEERAPPA

Section 143Section 260ASection 80P

Section 80P of the Act, disallowing Pigmi commission on the ground that no TDS was made of Rs.1,70,46,946/-. Accordingly

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INDIA PVT LTD

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/141/2020HC Karnataka21 Apr 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

2
Section 143(2)
Section 194
Section 2
Section 206A
Section 40
Section 80J

TDS deductions are claimed in the subsequent year. The amount of Rs.6,82,968 was received by the asessee in the following year. As rightly pointed out by the authorities, when the Assessee is following the maintenance of books of account on mercantile basis, accounting and reflecting on receipt basis is not proper and therefore, rightly they have upheld

THE COMMISSINER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) AND ANR vs. THE BIJAPUR DISTRICT CENTRAL

ITA/200014/2015HC Karnataka23 Mar 2018

Bench: R.DEVDAS,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260A

TDS, was liable to be made as per the provisions of Section 40 (a) (ia) of the Act. 4. Both the learned counsel at Bar fairly submitted that the said issue is no longer res-integra in view of the CBTD Circular No.19/2015 holding that such Co-operative Banks are not required to deduct tax at source an interest paid

WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed

ITA/724/2019HC Karnataka03 Aug 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,R. NATARAJ

Section 195Section 201(1)Section 260ASection 9(1)(vi)

80P, DODDAKANNELLI SARJAPUR ROAD, BENGALURU 560 035 REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS SENIOR MANAGER – CORPORATE TAX, MR.ACHAL DASS PAN AAACW03874 ... APPELLANT (BY SRI S GANESH, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI SANDEEP HUILGOL, ADVOCATE) AND: THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, RANGE 12, BANGALORE, BMTC COMPLEX, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU 560 095. …. RESPONDENT (BY SRI K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THIS ITA IS FILED

M/S WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/881/2008HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

80P, Doddakannelli, Sarjapur Road, Bangalore-560035. ...APPELLANT (By Sri Venkataraman, Senior Counsel for Dr.R.B.Krishna, Adv.) AND : The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 1(3), 3rd Floor, Central Revenue Buildings, Queens Road, Bangalore-560001. …RESPONDENT (By Sri E.R.Indrakumar, Senior Counsel for Sri K.V.Aravind, Adv.) This I.T.A. is filed under Section 260-A of I.T.Act, 1961 arising out of order

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WIPRO LTD

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/211/2009HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

80P, Doddakannelli, Sarjapur Road, Bangalore-560035. ...APPELLANT (By Sri Venkataraman, Senior Counsel for Dr.R.B.Krishna, Adv.) AND : The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 1(3), 3rd Floor, Central Revenue Buildings, Queens Road, Bangalore-560001. …RESPONDENT (By Sri E.R.Indrakumar, Senior Counsel for Sri K.V.Aravind, Adv.) This I.T.A. is filed under Section 260-A of I.T.Act, 1961 arising out of order