BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

168 results for “TDS”+ Section 45clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,874Delhi1,798Bangalore985Chennai636Kolkata412Hyderabad232Ahmedabad221Indore194Chandigarh169Jaipur168Karnataka168Cochin151Pune116Raipur101Visakhapatnam69Surat63Lucknow53Cuttack48Rajkot41Ranchi39Nagpur31Guwahati23Amritsar20Patna19Jodhpur15Telangana15Dehradun13Jabalpur11Agra10SC9Kerala8Allahabad8Varanasi4Uttarakhand3Panaji3Himachal Pradesh2Bombay1Calcutta1J&K1Punjab & Haryana1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 260159Section 234E84TDS48Section 194C8Section 234C6Section 143(3)5Disallowance5Section 260A4Section 153C4Section 144

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WIPRO LTD

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/211/2009HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

Section 154. Notice u/s 142(1) was issued on 21.12.2001 with a questionnaire. Further notices u/s 142 (1) were issued on various dates beginning from 7.10.2003 to 8.3.2004. The assessee- company filed written replies along with enclosures from time to time. The return furnished on 30.10.2001 was processed u/s 143(3) of the I.T.Act on 24.03.2004 and order was passed

M/S WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/881/2008HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

Showing 1–20 of 168 · Page 1 of 9

...
4
Deduction4
Addition to Income3

Section 154. Notice u/s 142(1) was issued on 21.12.2001 with a questionnaire. Further notices u/s 142 (1) were issued on various dates beginning from 7.10.2003 to 8.3.2004. The assessee- company filed written replies along with enclosures from time to time. The return furnished on 30.10.2001 was processed u/s 143(3) of the I.T.Act on 24.03.2004 and order was passed

M/S. POWER GRID CORPORATION vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

WP/43215/2015HC Karnataka07 Mar 2018

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

45(5)(b) of the 1961 Act.” 13. In the light of the authoritative pronouncement of Hon’ble Apex Court in GHANSHYAM’s case, interest awarded under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 would partake the component of enhanced compensation and when applied to the facts on hand, it would not detain this Court too long to arrive

M/S POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED vs. MR. B.B. MADAYA

WP/26380/2015HC Karnataka07 Mar 2018

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

45(5)(b) of the 1961 Act.” 13. In the light of the authoritative pronouncement of Hon’ble Apex Court in GHANSHYAM’s case, interest awarded under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 would partake the component of enhanced compensation and when applied to the facts on hand, it would not detain this Court too long to arrive

M/S POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

WP/27667/2015HC Karnataka07 Mar 2018

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

45(5)(b) of the 1961 Act.” 13. In the light of the authoritative pronouncement of Hon’ble Apex Court in GHANSHYAM’s case, interest awarded under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 would partake the component of enhanced compensation and when applied to the facts on hand, it would not detain this Court too long to arrive

M/S POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED vs. MR SWAMY GOWDA

WP/27668/2015HC Karnataka07 Mar 2018

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

45(5)(b) of the 1961 Act.” 13. In the light of the authoritative pronouncement of Hon’ble Apex Court in GHANSHYAM’s case, interest awarded under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 would partake the component of enhanced compensation and when applied to the facts on hand, it would not detain this Court too long to arrive

M/S. K K BROTHERS vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/3725/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS) ROOM NO.59, H.M.T. BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU-560032. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE NEWLY INSERTED SEC.234E OF THE IT ACT, BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2012 AS UNCONSTITUTIONALBEING ARBITRARY, DISCRIMINATORY & UNREASONABLE. THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF SECTION 234E IS ENCLOSED

M/S CATHODIC CONTROL CO LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/14294/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS) ROOM NO.59, H.M.T. BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU-560032. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE NEWLY INSERTED SEC.234E OF THE IT ACT, BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2012 AS UNCONSTITUTIONALBEING ARBITRARY, DISCRIMINATORY & UNREASONABLE. THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF SECTION 234E IS ENCLOSED

SYNDICATE BANK vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

WP/19398/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS) ROOM NO.59, H.M.T. BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU-560032. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE NEWLY INSERTED SEC.234E OF THE IT ACT, BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2012 AS UNCONSTITUTIONALBEING ARBITRARY, DISCRIMINATORY & UNREASONABLE. THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF SECTION 234E IS ENCLOSED

CENTRAL POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/15476/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS) ROOM NO.59, H.M.T. BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU-560032. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE NEWLY INSERTED SEC.234E OF THE IT ACT, BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2012 AS UNCONSTITUTIONALBEING ARBITRARY, DISCRIMINATORY & UNREASONABLE. THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF SECTION 234E IS ENCLOSED

ADITHYA BIZORP SOLUTIONS INDIA PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/6918/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS) ROOM NO.59, H.M.T. BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU-560032. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE NEWLY INSERTED SEC.234E OF THE IT ACT, BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2012 AS UNCONSTITUTIONALBEING ARBITRARY, DISCRIMINATORY & UNREASONABLE. THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF SECTION 234E IS ENCLOSED

M/S MAHRISHI MELTCHEMS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/53286/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS) ROOM NO.59, H.M.T. BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU-560032. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE NEWLY INSERTED SEC.234E OF THE IT ACT, BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2012 AS UNCONSTITUTIONALBEING ARBITRARY, DISCRIMINATORY & UNREASONABLE. THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF SECTION 234E IS ENCLOSED

M/S PROCESS PUMPS (I) PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/14296/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS) ROOM NO.59, H.M.T. BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU-560032. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE NEWLY INSERTED SEC.234E OF THE IT ACT, BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2012 AS UNCONSTITUTIONALBEING ARBITRARY, DISCRIMINATORY & UNREASONABLE. THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF SECTION 234E IS ENCLOSED

SRI. FATHERAJ SINGHVI vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/41614/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS) ROOM NO.59, H.M.T. BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU-560032. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE NEWLY INSERTED SEC.234E OF THE IT ACT, BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2012 AS UNCONSTITUTIONALBEING ARBITRARY, DISCRIMINATORY & UNREASONABLE. THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF SECTION 234E IS ENCLOSED

ECOLE SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/14669/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS) ROOM NO.59, H.M.T. BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU-560032. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE NEWLY INSERTED SEC.234E OF THE IT ACT, BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2012 AS UNCONSTITUTIONALBEING ARBITRARY, DISCRIMINATORY & UNREASONABLE. THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF SECTION 234E IS ENCLOSED

M/S HOTEL FISHLAND vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/12097/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS) ROOM NO.59, H.M.T. BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU-560032. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE NEWLY INSERTED SEC.234E OF THE IT ACT, BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2012 AS UNCONSTITUTIONALBEING ARBITRARY, DISCRIMINATORY & UNREASONABLE. THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF SECTION 234E IS ENCLOSED

M/S TEE ENN ENTERPRISES vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/19762/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS) ROOM NO.59, H.M.T. BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU-560032. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE NEWLY INSERTED SEC.234E OF THE IT ACT, BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2012 AS UNCONSTITUTIONALBEING ARBITRARY, DISCRIMINATORY & UNREASONABLE. THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF SECTION 234E IS ENCLOSED

M/S NEW MEDIA COMPANY vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/18788/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS) ROOM NO.59, H.M.T. BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU-560032. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE NEWLY INSERTED SEC.234E OF THE IT ACT, BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2012 AS UNCONSTITUTIONALBEING ARBITRARY, DISCRIMINATORY & UNREASONABLE. THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF SECTION 234E IS ENCLOSED

SRI CHANDRAKAR K KAMATH vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

WP/23541/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS) ROOM NO.59, H.M.T. BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU-560032. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE NEWLY INSERTED SEC.234E OF THE IT ACT, BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2012 AS UNCONSTITUTIONALBEING ARBITRARY, DISCRIMINATORY & UNREASONABLE. THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF SECTION 234E IS ENCLOSED

M/S PRAKASH BUS CORPORATION PVT LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

WP/37689/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS) ROOM NO.59, H.M.T. BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU-560032. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE NEWLY INSERTED SEC.234E OF THE IT ACT, BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2012 AS UNCONSTITUTIONALBEING ARBITRARY, DISCRIMINATORY & UNREASONABLE. THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF SECTION 234E IS ENCLOSED