THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S KALYANI STEELS LTD

The appeals stand dismissed

Bench: JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA,S.SUJATHA

TDS CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, STAFF ROAD, FORT, BELLARY-583 102. … APPELLANTS (BY SRI.Y.V.RAVIRAJ, ADV.) A N D : M/S KALYANI STEELS, LTD., HOSPET ROAD, GINIGRA, KOPPAL DIST. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.CHYTHANYA K.K, ADV.) THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S KALYANI STEELS LTD

The appeals stand dismissed

Bench: JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA,S.SUJATHA

TDS CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, STAFF ROAD, FORT, BELLARY-583 102. … APPELLANTS (BY SRI.Y.V.RAVIRAJ, ADV.) A N D : M/S KALYANI STEELS, LTD., HOSPET ROAD, GINIGRA, KOPPAL DIST. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.CHYTHANYA K.K, ADV.) THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S KALYANI STEELS LTD

The appeals stand dismissed

Bench: JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA,S.SUJATHA

TDS CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, STAFF ROAD, FORT, BELLARY-583 102. … APPELLANTS (BY SRI.Y.V.RAVIRAJ, ADV.) A N D : M/S KALYANI STEELS, LTD., HOSPET ROAD, GINIGRA, KOPPAL DIST. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.CHYTHANYA K.K, ADV.) THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A

THE COMMISSIONER vs. M/S MUKAND LTD

The appeals stand dismissed

Bench: JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA,S.SUJATHA

TDS CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, STAFF ROAD, FORT, BELLARY-583 102. … APPELLANTS (BY SRI.Y.V.RAVIRAJ, ADV.) A N D : M/S KALYANI STEELS, LTD., HOSPET ROAD, GINIGRA, KOPPAL DIST. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.CHYTHANYA K.K, ADV.) THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER vs. M/S OBULAPURAM MINING

Bench: K.SOMASHEKAR,UMESH M ADIGA

260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 praying to set aside the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘C’ Bench, Bengaluru in ITA No.653 (Bang) 2015, and confirm the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(3), Bengaluru. This ITA having been heard and reserved for judgment on 02.02.2023, coming on for pronouncement

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Appeals are dismissed

Bench: A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA,DEEPAK VERMA(ACJ)

TDS CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, STAFF ROAD, FORT, BELLARY – 583 102. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI AMEETKUMAR DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) 2 AND: THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER O & M DIVISION, (GESCOM), RAICHUR – 584 101. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI A. SHANKAR, SRI V. CHANDRASHEKAR & SRI M. LAVA, ADVOCATES) THIS INCOME-TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Appeals are dismissed

Bench: A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA,DEEPAK VERMA(ACJ)

TDS CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, STAFF ROAD, FORT, BELLARY – 583 102. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI AMEETKUMAR DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) 2 AND: THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER O & M DIVISION, (GESCOM), RAICHUR – 584 101. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI A. SHANKAR, SRI V. CHANDRASHEKAR & SRI M. LAVA, ADVOCATES) THIS INCOME-TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Appeals are dismissed

Bench: A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA,DEEPAK VERMA(ACJ)

TDS CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, STAFF ROAD, FORT, BELLARY – 583 102. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI AMEETKUMAR DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) 2 AND: THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER O & M DIVISION, (GESCOM), RAICHUR – 584 101. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI A. SHANKAR, SRI V. CHANDRASHEKAR & SRI M. LAVA, ADVOCATES) THIS INCOME-TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Appeals are dismissed

Bench: A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA,DEEPAK VERMA(ACJ)

TDS CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, STAFF ROAD, FORT, BELLARY – 583 102. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI AMEETKUMAR DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) 2 AND: THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER O & M DIVISION, (GESCOM), RAICHUR – 584 101. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI A. SHANKAR, SRI V. CHANDRASHEKAR & SRI M. LAVA, ADVOCATES) THIS INCOME-TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Appeals are dismissed

Bench: A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA,DEEPAK VERMA(ACJ)

TDS CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, STAFF ROAD, FORT, BELLARY – 583 102. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI AMEETKUMAR DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) 2 AND: THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER O & M DIVISION, (GESCOM), RAICHUR – 584 101. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI A. SHANKAR, SRI V. CHANDRASHEKAR & SRI M. LAVA, ADVOCATES) THIS INCOME-TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Appeals are dismissed

Bench: A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA,DEEPAK VERMA(ACJ)

TDS CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, STAFF ROAD, FORT, BELLARY – 583 102. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI AMEETKUMAR DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) 2 AND: THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER O & M DIVISION, (GESCOM), RAICHUR – 584 101. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI A. SHANKAR, SRI V. CHANDRASHEKAR & SRI M. LAVA, ADVOCATES) THIS INCOME-TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A

THE COMMISSINER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) AND ANR vs. THE BIJAPUR DISTRICT CENTRAL

Bench: R.DEVDAS,VINEET KOTHARI

260A of the Income Tax Act in the form of substantial questions of law arising out of the order of the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal are as under. 3. That the respondent-Co-operative Society engaged in the activities of Co-operative Bank for these Assessment Years in question failed to deduct tax at Date of order

TTK HEALTHCARE TPA PRIVATE LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

In the result, the appeal is disposed of

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

TDS), 4TH FLOOR, NO.59, HMT BHAVAN BELLARY ROAD, BANGALORE-560032. ... RESPONDENTS (BY Mr. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.) - - - THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T. ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 28.02.2013 PASSED IN ITA R 2 NOS.424-429/BANG/2011 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05 TO 2009-10, PRAYING THAT THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S ABBEY BUSINESS SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD

In the result, we do not find any merit in this

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short) has been preferred by the revenue. The subject matter of the appeal pertains to the Assessment year 2005-06. The appeal was admitted by a bench of this Court vide order dated 12.01.2016 on the following substantial questions of law: (i) Whether in the facts

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S ABBEY BUSINESS SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD

In the result, we do not find any merit in this

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short) has been preferred by the revenue. The subject matter of the appeal pertains to the Assessment year 2005-06. The appeal was admitted by a bench of this Court vide order dated 12.01.2016 on the following substantial questions of law: (i) Whether in the facts

WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,R. NATARAJ

260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is arising out of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Bengaluru, dated 21.6.2019 in ITA.Nos.1215-1220/Bang/2014 and ITA Nos.18- 23/Bang/2017 (M/s Wipro Limited v. The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax) for the assessment year 2007- 2008 to 2012-2013. 2. The facts of the case reveal

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 vs. M/S SUBEX TECHNOLOGIES LTD

In the result, the appeal is disposed of

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short) has been preferred by the revenue. The subject matter of the appeal pertains to the Assessment year 2008-09. The appeal was initially admitted by a bench of this Court vide order dated 03.01.2018 on the following substantial question of law: "Whether on the facts

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME- TAX vs. M/S IGATE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LTD.,

Bench: D.V.SHYLENDRA KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE ORDER DATED 15.09.2006 PASSED IN ITA NO. 1793/BANG/2005, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2004-05 AND ETC., THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, D V SHYLENDRA KUMAR, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J U D G M E N T These two appeals are preferred under the provisions