BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

195 results for “TDS”+ Section 25clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,927Delhi2,863Bangalore1,561Chennai1,050Kolkata669Ahmedabad514Hyderabad440Pune404Indore290Jaipur277Cochin270Chandigarh233Raipur225Karnataka195Surat121Nagpur106Rajkot96Cuttack92Visakhapatnam81Lucknow77Amritsar46Jodhpur44Dehradun42Ranchi39Guwahati38Agra30Allahabad29Kerala26Telangana26Panaji25Patna22SC12Jabalpur11Varanasi10Calcutta7Rajasthan5Uttarakhand2Orissa2Bombay1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 260144Section 234E84TDS56Section 260A16Section 1949Section 1928Section 143(3)8Deduction8Section 194J6Section 10A

SYNDICATE BANK vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals are partly allowed to the aforesaid extent

WA/2652/2015HC Karnataka26 Aug 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 4

TDS deducted for the respective assessment year prior to 1.6.2015. Hence, 29 the demand notices under Section 200A by the respondent- authority for intimation for payment of fee under Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law and the same are quashed and set aside to that extent. 25

M/S CATHODIC CONTROL CO. LTD., vs. UNION OF INDIA

The appeals are partly allowed to the aforesaid extent

WA/2648/2015HC Karnataka26 Aug 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 4

Showing 1–20 of 195 · Page 1 of 10

...
6
Addition to Income5
Survey u/s 133A4

TDS deducted for the respective assessment year prior to 1.6.2015. Hence, 29 the demand notices under Section 200A by the respondent- authority for intimation for payment of fee under Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law and the same are quashed and set aside to that extent. 25

SRI.FATHERAJ SINGHVI, vs. UNION OF INDIA

The appeals are partly allowed to the aforesaid extent

WA/2663/2015HC Karnataka26 Aug 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 4

TDS deducted for the respective assessment year prior to 1.6.2015. Hence, 29 the demand notices under Section 200A by the respondent- authority for intimation for payment of fee under Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law and the same are quashed and set aside to that extent. 25

M/S PROCESS PUMPS vs. UNION OF INDIA

The appeals are partly allowed to the aforesaid extent

WA/2650/2015HC Karnataka26 Aug 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 4

TDS deducted for the respective assessment year prior to 1.6.2015. Hence, 29 the demand notices under Section 200A by the respondent- authority for intimation for payment of fee under Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law and the same are quashed and set aside to that extent. 25

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S MANIPAL HEALTH SYSTEMS PVT LTD

Appeals are partly allowed to the extent indicated

ITA/747/2009HC Karnataka09 Mar 2015

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET SARAN

Section 133Section 192Section 194Section 194JSection 201(1)Section 260

TDS) vs APOLLO HOSPITALS INTERNATIONAL LTD. reported in (2013 (359) ITR 78) (Gujarat) has taken a similar view that the consultant doctors were not getting salary, but the payment to them was in the nature of professional fees liable to deduction under Section 194G and Section 192 of the Act had no application. 19. We are in agreement with

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S MANIPAL HEALTH SYSTEMS

Appeals are partly allowed to the extent indicated

ITA/746/2009HC Karnataka09 Mar 2015

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET SARAN

Section 133Section 192Section 194Section 194JSection 201(1)Section 260

TDS) vs APOLLO HOSPITALS INTERNATIONAL LTD. reported in (2013 (359) ITR 78) (Gujarat) has taken a similar view that the consultant doctors were not getting salary, but the payment to them was in the nature of professional fees liable to deduction under Section 194G and Section 192 of the Act had no application. 19. We are in agreement with

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/604/2015HC Karnataka21 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

TDS Under Section 194A. 3. A question has also been raised as to whether normal members, associate members and sympathizer members are also covered by the exemptions Under Section 194A(3)(v). It is hereby clarified that the exemption is available only to such members who have joined in application for the registration of the co-operative society and those

M/S.KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

In the result, the appeals are allowed

ITA/750/2009HC Karnataka02 Feb 2016

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

Section 194Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 260

TDS Officer and the Appellate Commissioner would go contrary to the provisions of Section 201[1] of the Act that existed during the relevant time. 26. We have examined the applicability of Section 194A of the Act to the present case. Section 194A of the Act mandates the tax deductor to deduct ‘income tax’ on ‘any income

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S VODAFONE SOUTH LTD

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/699/2015HC Karnataka28 Jul 2016

Bench: S.N.SATYANARAYANA,JAYANT PATEL

Section 260A

Section 9(1)(vii) Explanation-2. He also relied on the decision of Hon’ble Bangalore ITAT in the case of Bangalore Electricity Supply Co. Ltd. Vs. ITO (TDS) order dated 16.03.2012 2012(20) ITR (Trib) 265 wherein payment made by State Load Dispatch Center (SLDC) is held not liable to be deducted TDS U/s 194J

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS vs. M/S BHARAT HOTELS LIMITED

Appeal stands dismissed

ITA/393/2009HC Karnataka02 Dec 2015

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET SARAN

Section 143(3)Section 153Section 154Section 194Section 201Section 201(1)Section 206

TDS were to be initiated, it ought to have been reasonably done within the limitation provided for completion of assessment under Section 153 of the Act. The period for assessment or reassessment under Section 147 of the Act would be a different case, as it relates to income escaping assessment and not a normal, regular assessment. It would, thus

M/S WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/881/2008HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

TDS of Rs.6,02,14,066/- and advance tax payment of Rs.59,50,80,000/-. The assessee claimed refund of Rs.17,12,21,725/-. The return of income was processed u/s 143(1) on 31.01.2005 and the case was selected for scrutiny and notice u/s 143(2) was issued on 14.02.2005. A questionnaire was issued on 27.04.2006 calling for certain

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WIPRO LTD

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/211/2009HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

TDS of Rs.6,02,14,066/- and advance tax payment of Rs.59,50,80,000/-. The assessee claimed refund of Rs.17,12,21,725/-. The return of income was processed u/s 143(1) on 31.01.2005 and the case was selected for scrutiny and notice u/s 143(2) was issued on 14.02.2005. A questionnaire was issued on 27.04.2006 calling for certain

TTK HEALTHCARE TPA PRIVATE LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

In the result, the appeal is disposed of

ITA/303/2013HC Karnataka12 Oct 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 133ASection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 260Section 260A

TDS as prescribed under Section 194J has been upheld by the Bombay as well as Delhi High Court except to the extent of penalty as prescribed under Section 271C. It is also argued that the person referred to in Section 194J and Explanation (a) appended to Section 194J(1) need not himself / herself is to be a Doctor and therefore

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/648/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

Section 260

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/644/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

Section 260

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/654/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

Section 260

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/664/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

Section 260

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/768/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

Section 260

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/646/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

Section 260

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/642/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

Section 260

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that