CORPORATION BANK vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Raghvendra S. Chauhan Writ Petition Nos. 114401-404/2015 (T-It) Between: Corporation Bank Rep By Senior Manager, Kls Gotge College Of Commerce Branch Gogte College Campus Belagavi-590 006. ... Petitioner (By Sri. B S N Prasad & Sri.H R Kambiyavar, Advocates) And: 1. The Income Tax Officer (Tds) Fk Commercial Complex, Opp District Hospital, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Road, Belagavi-560001 2. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Fk Commercial Complex, Opp Civil Hospital, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Road, Belagavi-560001 ... Respondents

TDS was not made on interest paid to the VTU. The Bank further explained the reason why it should not be treated as an assessee in default. 4. Notwithstanding the explanation given by the petitioner-Bank, on 19.02.2015, the Income Tax Officer passed four separate, but identical orders, and treated the petitioner- Bank as an assessee in default, and raised

CORPORATION BANK vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Raghvendra S. Chauhan Writ Petition Nos. 114397-400/2015 (T-It) Between: Corporation Bank Rep By Chief Manager, Nehru Nagar Branch 1357/A, Pai Complex Opp. Hotel Ramdev P.B.Road, Belagavi-590010 ... Petitioner (By Sri. B S N Prasad & Sri.H R Kambiyavar, Advocates) And: 1. The Income Tax Officer (Tds) Fk Commercial Complex, Opp District Hospital, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Road, Belagavi-560001 2. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Fk Commercial Complex, Opp Civil Hospital, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Road, Belagavi-560001 ... Respondents

TDS was not made on interest paid to the VTU. The Bank further explained the reason why it should not be treated as an assessee in default. 4. Notwithstanding the explanation given by the petitioner-Bank, on 19.02.2015, the Income Tax Officer passed four separate, but identical orders, and treated the petitioner- Bank as an assessee in default, and raised

CORPORATION BANK, vs. THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER (TDS),

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Raghvendra S. Chauhan Writ Petition Nos. 114367-370/2015 (T-It) Between: Corporation Bank Rep By Chief Manager, Samadevi Galli Branch 3445/1B, Parvati Complex Samadevi Galli, Belagavi. ... Petitioner (By Sri. Narasimha Prasad B.S. & Sri.H R Kambiyavar, Advocates) And: 1. The Income Tax Officer (Tds) Fk Commercial Complex, Opp District Hospital, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Road, Belagavi-560001 2. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Fk Commercial Complex, Opp Civil Hospital, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Road, Belagavi-560001 ... Respondents

TDS was not made on interest paid to the VTU. The Bank further explained the reason why it should not be treated as an assessee in default. 4. Notwithstanding the explanation given by the petitioner-Bank, on 19.02.2015, the Income Tax Officer passed four separate, but identical orders, and treated the petitioner- Bank as an assessee in default, and raised

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S JINDAL ALUMINIUM

The appeal is allowed

Bench: B.MANOHAR,K.SREEDHAR RAO

TDS for the assessment year 1989-90. The returns were filed. The assessment order is made. It was found that the assessee is entitled to refund of Rs.25,00,000/- and odd. The refund is also given to the assessee. The Assessing Officer finds that the order of refund made is illegal and that assessee was in fact liable

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER vs. M/S OBULAPURAM MINING

Bench: K.SOMASHEKAR,UMESH M ADIGA

TDS was enquired by DCIT Circle-I, Ananthpur and ITO, Ward-I, Proddatur, Andhra Pradesh. The Assessing Officer without taking this evidence on record, furnishing copies of statements to assessee or permitting cross-examination,, relied on it and disallowed Rs.131,00,28,895/- and Rs.37,69,65,007/- in all Rs.168,69,93,902/-. Further, the assessing officer has proceeded

M/S WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 145A of the Income- tax Act which was inserted with effect from assessment year 1999-2000. The said provision states that the valuation of stock should include the amount of any tax duty, cess or fee - 94 - actually paid or incurred to bring the goods to its present location and condition. The Department has followed a consistent stand

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WIPRO LTD

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 145A of the Income- tax Act which was inserted with effect from assessment year 1999-2000. The said provision states that the valuation of stock should include the amount of any tax duty, cess or fee - 94 - actually paid or incurred to bring the goods to its present location and condition. The Department has followed a consistent stand

M/S HAJEE A.P.BAVA & COMPANY vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, the appeal is

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,M.NAGAPRASANNA

TDS recoveries. It was further held that as on the end of the accounting year ending on 31.03.2014 a sum of Rs.3,79,64,917.38/- was debited by passing a journal entry and therefore, it 7 is not clear whether the aforesaid amount was offered to tax. It was also held that mere wrong entry in the books of account

SRI M MUNISWAMY vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TDS ON GROUND REND AND RS.54,35,859/- TOWARDS THE LICENSE FEE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.34265/2018 BETWEEN 1. SRI C.THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/AT KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SRI C. MUNI REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.337, 2ND CROSS, 22ND MAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT

SIPANI PROPERTIES PVT LTD vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TDS ON GROUND REND AND RS.54,35,859/- TOWARDS THE LICENSE FEE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.34265/2018 BETWEEN 1. SRI C.THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/AT KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SRI C. MUNI REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.337, 2ND CROSS, 22ND MAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT

K S JUNJAPPA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TDS ON GROUND REND AND RS.54,35,859/- TOWARDS THE LICENSE FEE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.34265/2018 BETWEEN 1. SRI C.THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/AT KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SRI C. MUNI REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.337, 2ND CROSS, 22ND MAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT

DR M RAVINDRA VARMA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TDS ON GROUND REND AND RS.54,35,859/- TOWARDS THE LICENSE FEE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.34265/2018 BETWEEN 1. SRI C.THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/AT KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SRI C. MUNI REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.337, 2ND CROSS, 22ND MAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT

M/S. SUMADHURA INFRACON PVT. LTD., vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TDS ON GROUND REND AND RS.54,35,859/- TOWARDS THE LICENSE FEE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.34265/2018 BETWEEN 1. SRI C.THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/AT KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SRI C. MUNI REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.337, 2ND CROSS, 22ND MAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT

M/S DSR INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TDS ON GROUND REND AND RS.54,35,859/- TOWARDS THE LICENSE FEE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.34265/2018 BETWEEN 1. SRI C.THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/AT KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SRI C. MUNI REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.337, 2ND CROSS, 22ND MAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT

SRI. SHIVALINGAIAH vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TDS ON GROUND REND AND RS.54,35,859/- TOWARDS THE LICENSE FEE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.34265/2018 BETWEEN 1. SRI C.THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/AT KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SRI C. MUNI REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.337, 2ND CROSS, 22ND MAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT

L & T CONSTRUCTIONS EQUIPMENT vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TDS ON GROUND REND AND RS.54,35,859/- TOWARDS THE LICENSE FEE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.34265/2018 BETWEEN 1. SRI C.THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/AT KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SRI C. MUNI REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.337, 2ND CROSS, 22ND MAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT

M THIYAGARAJAN vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TDS ON GROUND REND AND RS.54,35,859/- TOWARDS THE LICENSE FEE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.34265/2018 BETWEEN 1. SRI C.THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/AT KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SRI C. MUNI REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.337, 2ND CROSS, 22ND MAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT

M/S SOBHA LIMITED vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TDS ON GROUND REND AND RS.54,35,859/- TOWARDS THE LICENSE FEE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.34265/2018 BETWEEN 1. SRI C.THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/AT KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SRI C. MUNI REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.337, 2ND CROSS, 22ND MAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT

SRI KRISHANAMA RAJU vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TDS ON GROUND REND AND RS.54,35,859/- TOWARDS THE LICENSE FEE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.34265/2018 BETWEEN 1. SRI C.THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/AT KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SRI C. MUNI REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.337, 2ND CROSS, 22ND MAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT