BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

31 results for “TDS”+ Section 194A(3)(iii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai263Delhi115Bangalore108Chandigarh93Chennai72Kolkata42Hyderabad36Karnataka31Jaipur26Ahmedabad22Pune21Visakhapatnam18Nagpur17Cuttack17Raipur15Amritsar8Dehradun7SC7Surat6Telangana6Indore5Jabalpur5Jodhpur5Panaji5Rajkot5Kerala4Ranchi3Allahabad3Cochin2Guwahati2J&K2Lucknow1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 194A(3)(v)115Section 19447Section 194A(3)(viia)46Section 194A(3)(i)46Section 260A31TDS29Section 26028Exemption23Section 201(1)3Section 201

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/518/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of 3 Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Showing 1–20 of 31 · Page 1 of 2

2
Deduction2

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/524/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/522/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/505/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/521/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/500/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/502/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/496/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/497/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/503/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/494/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/523/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/519/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/513/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/499/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/501/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/512/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/525/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/527/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/508/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3