BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

147 results for “TDS”+ Section 194(3)(iii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai497Delhi449Bangalore209Karnataka147Kolkata103Chennai83Chandigarh71Ahmedabad62Jaipur40Cochin40Raipur36Indore31Dehradun24Pune22Hyderabad18Cuttack14Amritsar13Jodhpur12Telangana10Visakhapatnam8Surat7SC6Guwahati5Panaji5Lucknow4Rajkot3Allahabad3Agra2Ranchi2Calcutta1J&K1Nagpur1Orissa1Kerala1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 260119Section 194A(3)(v)100Section 19445Section 194A(3)(viia)40Section 194A(3)(i)40TDS39Exemption20Section 201(1)4Section 194L4Section 194J

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INDIA PVT LTD

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/141/2020HC Karnataka21 Apr 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

Section 143(2)Section 194Section 2Section 206ASection 40Section 80J

iii) to section 80JJAA of the Act read with section 2(s) of the Industrial Dispute Act and employees who have worked for 300 I.T.A. NO.141 OF 2020 c/w I.T.A. NO.151 OF 2020 11 days in a previous are eligible for the purpose of deduction under section 80JJAA in the succeeding year if he completes 300 days in such succeeding

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Showing 1–20 of 147 · Page 1 of 8

...
3
Deduction3

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/518/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of 3 Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/524/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/522/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/523/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/525/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/519/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/513/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/497/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/496/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/501/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/500/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/512/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/503/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/494/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/502/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/499/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/527/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/521/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE APEX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/505/2015HC Karnataka27 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 194Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 260

iii) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in overlooking the established principle of ‘generalia specialibus non derogant’ vis-à- vis the specific provisions of Sec.194A(3)(viia)(b) and general provisions of Sec.194A(3)(v) of the Act? 3 (iv) Whether the tribunal was correct in not appreciating the fact that the provision of Section 194A(3