Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

153 results for “TDS”+ Section 192(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi774 Bangalore633 Mumbai570 Indore384 Chennai267 Karnataka153 Kolkata149 Raipur94 Pune92 Cochin81 Chandigarh75 Visakhapatnam68 Jaipur62 Hyderabad59 Ahmedabad47 Lucknow45 Cuttack34 Nagpur31 Jabalpur25 Amritsar21 Ranchi20 Jodhpur18 Agra14 Rajkot14 Telangana14 Allahabad12 Patna12 Dehradun11 Guwahati11 Kerala8 SC7 Surat4 Varanasi4 Panaji4 Orissa1 Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 26096 Section 234E84 TDS56 Section 260A30 Section 19213 Section 201(1)11 Deduction9 Section 1948 Section 194J7 Section 2016 Survey u/s 133A5 Disallowance2

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/648/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/664/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/644/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/663/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/646/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/669/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/665/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/666/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/650/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/652/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/770/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/670/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/667/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/649/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/766/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/642/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/769/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/671/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/654/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/662/2018HC Karnataka17 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

TDS from the salary of the employees, LTC was considered exempted under Section 10(5) of the Act read with Rule 2B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘Rules’ for short). - 23 - 5. A survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted in the business premises of the appellant’s Head Office on 26.12.2013 and it was noticed that

Showing 1–20 of 153 · Page 1 of 8

...