COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS vs. M/S BHARAT HOTELS LIMITED

Appeal stands dismissed

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET SARAN

5 under sub-section (1), and the amount of interest payable under sub-section (1A) of Section 201 of the Act was quantified. The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed by the Appellate Commissioner on 30.5.2008, holding that the order passed by the Assessing Officer was time barred. However, by subsequent order dated 30.9.2008 passed under Section

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WIPRO LTD

Bench: P.S.DINESH KUMAR,T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA

TDS provisions in the Act has to be read along with DTAA for computing the tax liability on the sum in question and therefore when the recipient is eligible for benefit of DTAA then there is no scope for deduction of tax @ 20% under Section 206AA of the Act when the assessing authority has rightly invoked said provision as conditions

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WIPRO LTD

Bench: P.S.DINESH KUMAR,T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA

TDS provisions in the Act has to be read along with DTAA for computing the tax liability on the sum in question and therefore when the recipient is eligible for benefit of DTAA then there is no scope for deduction of tax @ 20% under Section 206AA of the Act when the assessing authority has rightly invoked said provision as conditions

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WIPRO LTD

Bench: P.S.DINESH KUMAR,T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA

TDS provisions in the Act has to be read along with DTAA for computing the tax liability on the sum in question and therefore when the recipient is eligible for benefit of DTAA then there is no scope for deduction of tax @ 20% under Section 206AA of the Act when the assessing authority has rightly invoked said provision as conditions

M/S HOSMAT HOSPITAL PRIVATE LTD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF

Appeal is allowed in part

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

TDS provisions and - 5 - assessment proceedings of the consultant doctors on the facts and circumstances of the case? 3. Whether the Tribunal was not justified in law in holding that the appellant is not liable to pay interest under Section 201(1A) of the Act on the facts and circumstances of the case? 4. Whether the order passed under Sections

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is dismissed

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

TDS Return in Form 24Q was filed by the assessee under Section 192 of the Act read with Section 17(2) of the Act, for the period 01.04.2009 to 31.03.2010, which is applicable in respect of the employees of the Central Government. The Assessing Officer by order dated 26.04.2013 passed under Section 201(1) and 201(1A) read with Section

SRI M MUNISWAMY vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TDS ON GROUND REND AND RS.54,35,859/- TOWARDS THE LICENSE FEE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.34265/2018 BETWEEN 1. SRI C.THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/AT KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SRI C. MUNI REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.337, 2ND CROSS, 22ND MAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT

SIPANI PROPERTIES PVT LTD vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TDS ON GROUND REND AND RS.54,35,859/- TOWARDS THE LICENSE FEE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.34265/2018 BETWEEN 1. SRI C.THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/AT KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SRI C. MUNI REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.337, 2ND CROSS, 22ND MAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT

SRI. SHIVALINGAIAH vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TDS ON GROUND REND AND RS.54,35,859/- TOWARDS THE LICENSE FEE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.34265/2018 BETWEEN 1. SRI C.THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/AT KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SRI C. MUNI REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.337, 2ND CROSS, 22ND MAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT

K S JUNJAPPA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TDS ON GROUND REND AND RS.54,35,859/- TOWARDS THE LICENSE FEE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.34265/2018 BETWEEN 1. SRI C.THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/AT KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SRI C. MUNI REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.337, 2ND CROSS, 22ND MAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT

DR M RAVINDRA VARMA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TDS ON GROUND REND AND RS.54,35,859/- TOWARDS THE LICENSE FEE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.34265/2018 BETWEEN 1. SRI C.THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/AT KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SRI C. MUNI REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.337, 2ND CROSS, 22ND MAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT

M/S. SUMADHURA INFRACON PVT. LTD., vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TDS ON GROUND REND AND RS.54,35,859/- TOWARDS THE LICENSE FEE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.34265/2018 BETWEEN 1. SRI C.THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/AT KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SRI C. MUNI REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.337, 2ND CROSS, 22ND MAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT

M/S DSR INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TDS ON GROUND REND AND RS.54,35,859/- TOWARDS THE LICENSE FEE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.34265/2018 BETWEEN 1. SRI C.THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/AT KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SRI C. MUNI REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.337, 2ND CROSS, 22ND MAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT

L & T CONSTRUCTIONS EQUIPMENT vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TDS ON GROUND REND AND RS.54,35,859/- TOWARDS THE LICENSE FEE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.34265/2018 BETWEEN 1. SRI C.THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/AT KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SRI C. MUNI REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.337, 2ND CROSS, 22ND MAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT

M/S SOBHA LIMITED vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TDS ON GROUND REND AND RS.54,35,859/- TOWARDS THE LICENSE FEE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.34265/2018 BETWEEN 1. SRI C.THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/AT KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SRI C. MUNI REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.337, 2ND CROSS, 22ND MAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT

M THIYAGARAJAN vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TDS ON GROUND REND AND RS.54,35,859/- TOWARDS THE LICENSE FEE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.34265/2018 BETWEEN 1. SRI C.THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/AT KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SRI C. MUNI REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.337, 2ND CROSS, 22ND MAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT

SRI KRISHANAMA RAJU vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TDS ON GROUND REND AND RS.54,35,859/- TOWARDS THE LICENSE FEE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.34265/2018 BETWEEN 1. SRI C.THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/AT KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SRI C. MUNI REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.337, 2ND CROSS, 22ND MAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT

SMT. H G SHEELA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

TDS ON GROUND REND AND RS.54,35,859/- TOWARDS THE LICENSE FEE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.34265/2018 BETWEEN 1. SRI C.THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/AT KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SRI C. MUNI REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA ABBAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.337, 2ND CROSS, 22ND MAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT