BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 124(3)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi397Mumbai386Bangalore198Kolkata84Hyderabad81Jaipur59Raipur58Cochin57Chennai53Ahmedabad41Chandigarh32Visakhapatnam22Pune20Indore18Cuttack12Jodhpur9Guwahati8Lucknow8Surat6Karnataka5SC3Ranchi3Amritsar3Nagpur2Rajkot2Dehradun1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 26017Section 194H6Section 143(3)2Section 402

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III, vs. M/S. TELCO CONSTRUCTION

In the result, we do not find any merit in this

ITA/336/2014HC Karnataka16 Feb 2021

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,R. NATARAJ

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 260Section 40

TDS on the provisions when party has not been identified. Therefore, no adverse inference can be drawn as the assessee could not perform the impossible. It is further submitted that in light of 1st proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act which was inserted with effect from 01.04.2010, the disallowance under Section

NICE LTD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/7/2019
HC Karnataka
26 Mar 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

Section 143(3)Section 260Section 9Section 9(1)(vi)

3) of the Income-tax Act and an assessment order was passed on 15.4.2014. In the assessment order it was held that the amount received by the appellant from the sale of software was in the nature of royalty in terms of Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act. Being aggrieved by the order passed by the Commissioner

M/S WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/881/2008HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

Section 145A of the Income- tax Act which was inserted with effect from assessment year 1999-2000. The said provision states that the valuation of stock should include the amount of any tax duty, cess or fee - 94 - actually paid or incurred to bring the goods to its present location and condition. The Department has followed a consistent stand

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WIPRO LTD

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/211/2009HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

Section 145A of the Income- tax Act which was inserted with effect from assessment year 1999-2000. The said provision states that the valuation of stock should include the amount of any tax duty, cess or fee - 94 - actually paid or incurred to bring the goods to its present location and condition. The Department has followed a consistent stand

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S URBAN LADDER HOME DECOR SOLUTIONS PVT LTD

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/11/2022HC Karnataka07 Feb 2025

Bench: V KAMESWAR RAO,S RACHAIAH

Section 260

section 201(1A)(23 months) 59,80,804 Total 3,19,84,310 Issue demand notice and challan accordingly.” 6. Before noting the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, it is necessary to state in brief the nature of payments made to the aforesaid three entities. (a) Payments made to Facebook, Ireland: The assessee-Company uses Facebook