Search: TDS | BharatTax

6 results for “TDS”+ Section 10Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 26016 Section 10A9 Section 1954 Section 404 TDS3 Disallowance3 Section 80H2 Deduction2

M/S WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/881/2008HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

Section 154. Notice u/s 142(1) was issued on 21.12.2001 with a questionnaire. Further notices u/s 142 (1) were issued on various dates beginning from 7.10.2003 to 8.3.2004. The assessee- company filed written replies along with enclosures from time to time. The return furnished on 30.10.2001 was processed u/s 143(3) of the I.T.Act on 24.03.2004 and order was passed

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WIPRO LTD

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/211/2009HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S WIPRO LIMITED

In the result, the appeal is disposed of in terms

ITA/464/2017HC Karnataka09 Dec 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 10ASection 260Section 260ASection 32

TDS on payment made to purchase of software and has claimed depreciation under Section 32 of the Act on such software. It is also pointed out that the intent of disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act is to ensure prevention of revenue leakage on foreign payments as recovery of tax from non resident payees was difficult. With

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S CERNER HEALTH

In the result, the appeal is disposed of

ITA/210/2016HC Karnataka26 May 2021

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

Section 10ASection 195Section 260Section 40

TDS? b) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal, was justified in setting aside the re-computation of section 10A

LITTLE EYE SOFTWARE LABS PRIVATE LIMITED

In the result, the appeal is disposed of

COP/210/2016HC Karnataka25 Nov 2016

Bench: VINEET KOTHARI

Section 10ASection 195Section 260Section 40

TDS? b) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal, was justified in setting aside the re-computation of section 10A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES LTD

The appeal is disposed off

ITA/174/2011HC Karnataka19 Nov 2018

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath

Section 10ASection 195Section 260Section 40Section 80H

SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 21/01/2011 PASSED IN ITA No.1140/BANG/2009, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004- 2005, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE IN ITA No.1140/BANG/2009 DATED 21/01/2011 AND CONFIRM