THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S URBAN LADDER HOME DECOR SOLUTIONS PVT LTD

Appeals are dismissed

Bench: V KAMESWAR RAO,S RACHAIAH

02 Interest under section 201(1A)(23 months) 59,80,804 Total 3,19,84,310 Issue demand notice and challan accordingly.” 6. Before noting the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, it is necessary to state in brief the nature of payments made to the aforesaid three entities. (a) Payments made to Facebook, Ireland: The assessee

M/S WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

TDS of Rs.6,02,14,066/- and advance tax payment of Rs.59,50,80,000/-. The assessee claimed refund of Rs.17,12,21,725/-. The return of income was processed u/s 143(1) on 31.01.2005 and the case was selected for scrutiny and notice u/s 143(2) was issued on 14.02.2005. A questionnaire was issued on 27.04.2006 calling for certain

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WIPRO LTD

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

TDS of Rs.6,02,14,066/- and advance tax payment of Rs.59,50,80,000/-. The assessee claimed refund of Rs.17,12,21,725/-. The return of income was processed u/s 143(1) on 31.01.2005 and the case was selected for scrutiny and notice u/s 143(2) was issued on 14.02.2005. A questionnaire was issued on 27.04.2006 calling for certain

MPHASIS LTD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

TDS but failed to do so before making payments for onsite services and selling commission to the AEs. Hence, it is required to disallow the said expenses u/s.40(a)(i) of the IT Act. Therefore I have reason to believe that Rs.722,02,48,792/- has escaped assessment within the meaning of section

SMT BHIMABAI W/O NIJALINGAPPA vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ORS

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Nataraj Rangaswamy Writ Petition No.200748/2021 (T-It) Between: Smt. Bhimabai W/O Nijalingappa Since Deceased By Her Lr Sri. Revanasiddappa S/O: Nijalingappa Kattimani Age: 63 Years R/O: Naganahalli Tq & Dist: Kalaburagi.

TDS DEDUCTED AS PER FORM NO.16A, VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND ETC., THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:- 3 ORDER This writ petition is filed by the Assessee challenging an order passed under Section 119 (2)(b) of the Income- tax Act, 1961 dated 13.05.2019, by which an application filed by the petitioner

SRI M MUNISWAMY vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

02,500/- 12 TOWARDS MARKET VALUE OF PARK AND OPEN SPACE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.57920/2015 BETWEEN 1. SMT. LATHA K W/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 2. SRI RONAK R S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, 3. SRI R DHARSHAN S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING

M/S. SUMADHURA INFRACON PVT. LTD., vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

02,500/- 12 TOWARDS MARKET VALUE OF PARK AND OPEN SPACE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.57920/2015 BETWEEN 1. SMT. LATHA K W/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 2. SRI RONAK R S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, 3. SRI R DHARSHAN S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING

SIPANI PROPERTIES PVT LTD vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

02,500/- 12 TOWARDS MARKET VALUE OF PARK AND OPEN SPACE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.57920/2015 BETWEEN 1. SMT. LATHA K W/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 2. SRI RONAK R S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, 3. SRI R DHARSHAN S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING

SRI. SHIVALINGAIAH vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

02,500/- 12 TOWARDS MARKET VALUE OF PARK AND OPEN SPACE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.57920/2015 BETWEEN 1. SMT. LATHA K W/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 2. SRI RONAK R S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, 3. SRI R DHARSHAN S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING

DR M RAVINDRA VARMA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

02,500/- 12 TOWARDS MARKET VALUE OF PARK AND OPEN SPACE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.57920/2015 BETWEEN 1. SMT. LATHA K W/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 2. SRI RONAK R S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, 3. SRI R DHARSHAN S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING

M/S SOBHA LIMITED vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

02,500/- 12 TOWARDS MARKET VALUE OF PARK AND OPEN SPACE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.57920/2015 BETWEEN 1. SMT. LATHA K W/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 2. SRI RONAK R S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, 3. SRI R DHARSHAN S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING

L & T CONSTRUCTIONS EQUIPMENT vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

02,500/- 12 TOWARDS MARKET VALUE OF PARK AND OPEN SPACE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.57920/2015 BETWEEN 1. SMT. LATHA K W/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 2. SRI RONAK R S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, 3. SRI R DHARSHAN S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING

K S JUNJAPPA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

02,500/- 12 TOWARDS MARKET VALUE OF PARK AND OPEN SPACE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.57920/2015 BETWEEN 1. SMT. LATHA K W/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 2. SRI RONAK R S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, 3. SRI R DHARSHAN S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING

M THIYAGARAJAN vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

02,500/- 12 TOWARDS MARKET VALUE OF PARK AND OPEN SPACE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.57920/2015 BETWEEN 1. SMT. LATHA K W/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 2. SRI RONAK R S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, 3. SRI R DHARSHAN S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING

M/S DSR INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

02,500/- 12 TOWARDS MARKET VALUE OF PARK AND OPEN SPACE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.57920/2015 BETWEEN 1. SMT. LATHA K W/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 2. SRI RONAK R S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, 3. SRI R DHARSHAN S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING

M/S BHARTIYA CITY DEVELOPERS vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

02,500/- 12 TOWARDS MARKET VALUE OF PARK AND OPEN SPACE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.57920/2015 BETWEEN 1. SMT. LATHA K W/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 2. SRI RONAK R S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, 3. SRI R DHARSHAN S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING

ST JOSEPH COLLEGE HOSTEL vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

02,500/- 12 TOWARDS MARKET VALUE OF PARK AND OPEN SPACE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.57920/2015 BETWEEN 1. SMT. LATHA K W/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 2. SRI RONAK R S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, 3. SRI R DHARSHAN S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING

SRI KRISHANAMA RAJU vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

02,500/- 12 TOWARDS MARKET VALUE OF PARK AND OPEN SPACE ETC. IN WRIT PETITION No.57920/2015 BETWEEN 1. SMT. LATHA K W/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 2. SRI RONAK R S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, 3. SRI R DHARSHAN S/O LATE T K RAMESH AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING