BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

151 results for “TDS”+ Penaltyclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,109Mumbai1,857Bangalore682Pune611Chennai535Ahmedabad386Kolkata362Hyderabad324Jaipur318Indore233Raipur214Chandigarh190Karnataka151Cochin137Nagpur117Surat109Visakhapatnam102Cuttack94Jabalpur94Rajkot84Lucknow61Dehradun43Jodhpur34Guwahati33Agra31Amritsar30Allahabad29Ranchi24Panaji23Patna16Telangana15SC13Varanasi11Calcutta3Orissa2Kerala2

Key Topics

Section 234E90Section 26073TDS55Section 260A8Section 143(3)6Addition to Income6Section 1545Section 201(1)5Section 2015Section 271

M/S CATHODIC CONTROL CO. LTD., vs. UNION OF INDIA

The appeals are partly allowed to the aforesaid extent

WA/2648/2015HC Karnataka26 Aug 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 4

penalty for default in filing TDS statement and also for furnishing of incorrect information in such TDS statement. The proviso

SRI.FATHERAJ SINGHVI, vs. UNION OF INDIA

The appeals are partly allowed to the aforesaid extent

WA/2663/2015HC Karnataka26 Aug 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 4

penalty for default in filing TDS statement and also for furnishing of incorrect information in such TDS statement. The proviso

Showing 1–20 of 151 · Page 1 of 8

...
5
Deduction4
Penalty4

SYNDICATE BANK vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals are partly allowed to the aforesaid extent

WA/2652/2015HC Karnataka26 Aug 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 4

penalty for default in filing TDS statement and also for furnishing of incorrect information in such TDS statement. The proviso

M/S PROCESS PUMPS vs. UNION OF INDIA

The appeals are partly allowed to the aforesaid extent

WA/2650/2015HC Karnataka26 Aug 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 4

penalty for default in filing TDS statement and also for furnishing of incorrect information in such TDS statement. The proviso

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S JINDAL TRACTEBEL POWER CO LTD

ITA/1184/2006HC Karnataka03 Feb 2025

Bench: KRISHNA S DIXIT,G BASAVARAJA

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 260ASection 271Section 271CSection 273

TDS) initiated penalty proceedings u/s.271(C) for failure to deduct tax. Disregarding the explanation offered by the respondent herein, penalty

M/S PROCESS PUMPS (I) PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/14296/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

M/S HOTEL FISHLAND vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/12097/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

M/S CATHODIC CONTROL CO LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/14294/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

ADITHYA BIZORP SOLUTIONS INDIA PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/6918/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

SREE C B EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL TRUST vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/38127/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

M/S TEACHERS CO OPERATIVE BANK vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/16939/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

M/S PRODIGY TECHNOVATIONS PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/11889/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

M/S. LAKSHMINIRMAN BANGALORE PVT.LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

WP/26589/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

MINTENT SERVICED APARTMENTS PVT LTD., vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/25841/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

M/S PRAKASH BUS CORPORATION PVT LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

WP/37689/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

SRI CHANDRAKAR K KAMATH vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

WP/23541/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

SYNDICATE BANK vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

WP/19398/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

ECOLE SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/14669/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

SRI. FATHERAJ SINGHVI vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/41614/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

M/S MAHRISHI MELTCHEMS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/53286/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned