M/S CATHODIC CONTROL CO. LTD., vs. UNION OF INDIA

The appeals are partly allowed to the aforesaid extent

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

penalty for default in filing TDS statement and also for furnishing of incorrect information in such TDS statement. The proviso

SYNDICATE BANK vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals are partly allowed to the aforesaid extent

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

penalty for default in filing TDS statement and also for furnishing of incorrect information in such TDS statement. The proviso

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S JINDAL TRACTEBEL POWER CO LTD

Bench: KRISHNA S DIXIT,G BASAVARAJA

TDS) initiated penalty proceedings u/s.271(C) for failure to deduct tax. Disregarding the explanation offered by the respondent herein, penalty

SRI. FATHERAJ SINGHVI vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

ECOLE SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

M/S PRODIGY TECHNOVATIONS PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

M/S. K K BROTHERS vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

M/S PROCESS PUMPS (I) PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

CENTRAL POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

M/S. LAKSHMINIRMAN BANGALORE PVT.LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

M/S HOTEL FISHLAND vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

M/S TEE ENN ENTERPRISES vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

SRI CHANDRAKAR K KAMATH vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

M/S MAHRISHI MELTCHEMS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

M/S PRAKASH BUS CORPORATION PVT LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

M/S NEW MEDIA COMPANY vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

M/S NEW MEDIA COMPANY vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned

SREE C B EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL TRUST vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

TDS statements, Fee is sought to be recovered under Section 234E, it is levy of penalty in disguise though the impugned