BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

443 results for “TDS”+ Deductionclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,816Delhi5,401Bangalore2,605Chennai2,203Kolkata1,839Pune1,422Ahmedabad1,140Hyderabad869Cochin757Patna747Indore731Jaipur671Chandigarh551Karnataka443Nagpur390Cuttack365Raipur359Visakhapatnam316Surat257Rajkot228Lucknow184Amritsar165Ranchi138Jodhpur134Dehradun93Agra86Jabalpur85Panaji84Guwahati76Telangana68Allahabad67Varanasi26SC25Calcutta21Kerala17Himachal Pradesh6Rajasthan6Punjab & Haryana5J&K5Orissa4Uttarakhand2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 234E90TDS79Section 26066Deduction33Section 4024Section 260A20Addition to Income17Section 194A16Section 201(1)13Section 263

L. VENKATARAMANA RAJU vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/53718/2017HC Karnataka21 Apr 2022

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice S.R.Krishna Kumar

Section 96

deduct the tax at source (TDS) on the compensation amount and the action of the respondents in deducting the tax at source

M/S SRI BALAJI CORPORATE SERVICES vs. UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE

WP/43206/2018HC Karnataka21 Apr 2022

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice S.R.Krishna Kumar

Section 96

deduct the tax at source (TDS) on the compensation amount and the action of the respondents in deducting the tax at source

Showing 1–20 of 443 · Page 1 of 23

...
9
Section 80H8
Disallowance8

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S VODAFONE SOUTH LTD

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/699/2015HC Karnataka28 Jul 2016

Bench: S.N.SATYANARAYANA,JAYANT PATEL

Section 260A

TDS was deductible and as TDS was not deducted, the amount as per Section 201 and 201(1A) of the Act were

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS vs. M/S BHARAT HOTELS LIMITED

Appeal stands dismissed

ITA/393/2009HC Karnataka02 Dec 2015

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET SARAN

Section 143(3)Section 153Section 154Section 194Section 201Section 201(1)Section 206

deducted the tax at source (TDS), as was required under Section 194 I of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short

CORPORATION BANK vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)

WP/114401/2015HC Karnataka18 Dec 2015

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Raghvendra S. Chauhan Writ Petition Nos. 114401-404/2015 (T-It) Between: Corporation Bank Rep By Senior Manager, Kls Gotge College Of Commerce Branch Gogte College Campus Belagavi-590 006. ... Petitioner (By Sri. B S N Prasad & Sri.H R Kambiyavar, Advocates) And: 1. The Income Tax Officer (Tds) Fk Commercial Complex, Opp District Hospital, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Road, Belagavi-560001 2. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Fk Commercial Complex, Opp Civil Hospital, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Road, Belagavi-560001 ... Respondents

Section 10Section 131Section 133(6)Section 139Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 220(6)Section 246A(1)(ha)

deduct the TDS. In case the Bank does not deduct the TDS, it has to face the consequences as mentioned

CORPORATION BANK vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)

WP/114397/2015HC Karnataka18 Dec 2015

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Raghvendra S. Chauhan Writ Petition Nos. 114397-400/2015 (T-It) Between: Corporation Bank Rep By Chief Manager, Nehru Nagar Branch 1357/A, Pai Complex Opp. Hotel Ramdev P.B.Road, Belagavi-590010 ... Petitioner (By Sri. B S N Prasad & Sri.H R Kambiyavar, Advocates) And: 1. The Income Tax Officer (Tds) Fk Commercial Complex, Opp District Hospital, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Road, Belagavi-560001 2. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Fk Commercial Complex, Opp Civil Hospital, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Road, Belagavi-560001 ... Respondents

Section 10Section 131Section 133(6)Section 139Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 220(6)Section 246A(1)(ha)

deduct the TDS. In case the Bank does not deduct the TDS, it has to face the consequences as mentioned

BANK OF BARODA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)

WP/114181/2015HC Karnataka18 Dec 2015

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Raghvendra S. Chauhan Writ Petition Nos. 114181-184/2015 (T-It) Between: Bank Of Baroda Rep By Chief Manager, Belagavi Branch, 1568, Maruti Galli, Belagavi-590002 ... Petitioner (By Sri. B S N Prasad & Sri.H R Kambiyavar, Advocates) And: 1. The Income Tax Officer (Tds) Fk Commercial Complex, Opp District Hospital, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Road, Belagavi-560001 2. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Fk Commercial Complex, Opp Civil Hospital, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Road, Belagavi-560001 ... Respondents R

Section 10Section 131Section 133(6)Section 139Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 220(6)Section 246A(1)(ha)

deduct the TDS. In case the Bank does not deduct the TDS, it has to face the consequences as mentioned

CORPORATION BANK, vs. THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER (TDS),

WP/114367/2015HC Karnataka18 Dec 2015

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Raghvendra S. Chauhan Writ Petition Nos. 114367-370/2015 (T-It) Between: Corporation Bank Rep By Chief Manager, Samadevi Galli Branch 3445/1B, Parvati Complex Samadevi Galli, Belagavi. ... Petitioner (By Sri. Narasimha Prasad B.S. & Sri.H R Kambiyavar, Advocates) And: 1. The Income Tax Officer (Tds) Fk Commercial Complex, Opp District Hospital, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Road, Belagavi-560001 2. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Fk Commercial Complex, Opp Civil Hospital, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Road, Belagavi-560001 ... Respondents

Section 10Section 131Section 133(6)Section 139Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 220(6)Section 246A(1)(ha)

deduct the TDS. In case the Bank does not deduct the TDS, it has to face the consequences as mentioned

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S E4E BUSINESS SOLUTIONS PVT LTD

The Appeal is dismissed

ITA/329/2016HC Karnataka31 Aug 2018

Bench: The Hon’Ble Dr. Justice H.B.Prabhakara Sastry

Section 96

deducting the TDS amount. However, at the request of the defendant that the said arrears need not be deducted from

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME vs. SRI SCORPIO ENGINEERING

ITA/551/2015HC Karnataka29 Feb 2016

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,JAYANT PATEL

Section 139Section 260Section 40

TDS either not deducted or deducted but not paid in respect of payment of interest, commission or brokerage etc., before

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S LUWA INDIA PVT LTD

RP/333/2012HC Karnataka22 Jun 2012

Bench: RAVI MALIMATH,N.KUMAR

Section 260

TDS either not deducted or deducted but not paid in respect of payment of interest, commission or brokerage etc., before

J SOMASHEKAR vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/6217/2019HC Karnataka12 Jan 2022

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice S. Sunil Dutt Yadav Writ Petition No.6217/2019 (T-It) Between: J. Somashekar S/O Sri C. Jayaraj Aged About 46 Years Residing At No.2223, 39Th 'F' Cross 4Th 'T' Block, Jayanagar Bengaluru - 560 041.

Section 154Section 205

deduction of TDS has passed the assessment orders without giving credit to the TDS deducted by the tenants. It is further

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S URBAN LADDER HOME DECOR SOLUTIONS PVT LTD

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/11/2022HC Karnataka07 Feb 2025

Bench: V KAMESWAR RAO,S RACHAIAH

Section 260

deduct TDS on such payments made to non- residents. - 8 - ITA No. 11 of 2022 c/w ITA No. 12 of 2022, ITA No. 14 of 2022 & ITA No. 15 of 2022 4. These

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S JINDAL TRACTEBEL POWER CO LTD

ITA/1184/2006HC Karnataka03 Feb 2025

Bench: KRISHNA S DIXIT,G BASAVARAJA

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 260ASection 271Section 271CSection 273

deduction of TDS and belated transfer of the TDS amount deducted to the department was due to reasonable cause and penalty

THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER vs. KUMARI ANJU MATHEW

WP/35477/2018HC Karnataka21 Jan 2022

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Ashok S. Kinagi

Section 194

deducting the amount deposited by the Corporation towards TDS. 14 14. The Corporation deducted a sum of Rs.2,54,860/- towards

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5 vs. M/S. PUMA SPORTS INDIA P., LTD.,

The appeal stands dismissed

ITA/223/2018HC Karnataka12 Mar 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,V SRISHANANDA

Section 143(3)Section 144Section 260Section 40Section 5(2)(b)Section 9(1)(i)Section 92C

TDS is not deductible from commission payment to foreign agent in the present case especially when the assessee failed to deduct

M/S SHUBHANKAR ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED vs. THE SENIOR SUB-REGISTRAR

WP/57385/2013HC Karnataka03 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice A S Bopanna

Section 194Section 194LSection 203A

deduction of TDS and the first respondent requiring the transferees to produce such proof for deduction of TDS. 4. In a normal

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. JANANI TOURS & RESORTS (P) LTD

Appeal is allowed

ITA/365/2009HC Karnataka19 Jan 2015

Bench: B.VEERAPPA,N.KUMAR

Section 194CSection 260ASection 40

deducted tax on payments made to such taxi owners. The said TDS deduction was remitted, according to the Assessing Officer

MPHASIS LTD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

WP/55355/2017HC Karnataka21 Jan 2020

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

Section 139Section 142Section 143Section 147Section 148Section 40

deduction of TDS; what is stated is that the petitioner had failed to deduct the TDS; the Proviso employs the expression

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI PETER KENNEDY

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/140/2009HC Karnataka23 Jan 2015

Bench: B.VEERAPPA,N.KUMAR

Section 260

TDS verification, it was noticed that the assessee has not deducted tax on certain amount payable as professional charges to the consultants/doctors