SHRI SHESHAVTAR 1008 SHRI KALLAJI VEDPITH EVAM SHODH SANSTHAN,NIMBAHERA, CHITTORGARH vs. ITO EXEMPTION WARD, UDAIPUR, AAYKAR BHAWAN, UDAIPUR
In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed
ITA 268/JODH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 Apr 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member), DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)
For Appellant: Shri Sunil Surana, CA &For Respondent: Shri Karni Dan, Addl. CIT, Sr.DR
Section 115BSection 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 234BSection 234DSection 250
144 DTR 261Commissioner of Income-tax, Bikaner v. Krishi Upaj
Mandi Samiti, Raisinghnagarupheld the principle of substance over form and ruled that a taxpayer should not be deprived of legitimate deductions simply due to procedural omissions in the original return, especially when the claim is backed by proper evidence.
The Court also acknowledged the Assessing Officer’s discretion to entertain