BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 270A(9)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi195Mumbai179Jaipur55Hyderabad45Ahmedabad42Chandigarh32Chennai32Bangalore31Pune30Rajkot25Lucknow16Guwahati16Surat12Nagpur9Raipur7Kolkata7Indore5Agra5Jodhpur3Cuttack3Cochin3Amritsar2Dehradun2Patna2SC1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 270A8Section 143(3)3Section 80G3Addition to Income3Section 402Section 1392Penalty2TDS2

DEEPAK KUMAR RAJORIA,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD-1(2), BIKANER

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 170/JODH/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur11 Aug 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Assessing Authority Tax Was Paid & Adjust From Tds The Appellant Was Aware Of The Fact That There Is Any Form By Filing Which The Penalty May Be Dropped So The Penalty Was Never Leviable In This Case Therefore The Penalty U/S 270A May Please Be Cancelled. 3. The Appellant Prays For Justice & Relief. 4. The Appellant May Please Be Permitted To Raise Any Addition Or Alternative Ground At Or Before The Hearing.”

Section 143(3)Section 270ASection 271(1)(C)Section 274Section 80G

9,29,620/- After that Ld. AO initiated penal proceedings U/S 270A of the IT Act 1961 and imposed a penalty u/s 270A Rs. 191500/-. On before I appeal CIT(A) confirmed the penalty order. Being aggrieved to the said order I have filed an appeal before your office. Now your office has awarded me the honor to submit

RITU ROAD LINES,JODHPUR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-02, JODHPUR

Appeal of the assessee is Partly Allowed

ITA 34/JODH/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur08 Nov 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.34/Jodh/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Ritu Road Lines, The Dcit, Plot No.12-14, Nakoda V Central Circle-2, Jodhpur. Industrial Area, Basni, S Jodhpur – 342001. Pan: Aaafr9440D Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue Assessee By Shri Amit Kothari – Ar Revenue By Smt. Alka Rajvanshi Jain – Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 16/08/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 08/11/2023

Section 115BSection 132Section 139Section 143(3)Section 234BSection 250Section 270A(1)

270A(1) of the Income Tax Act are also being initiated separately. (Addition of Rs.15,00,000/-) 7. Further, during the course of search proceedings, unaccounted 3 Ritu Road Lines [A] spare parts amounting to Rs. 90,140/- from the premise of the assessee. Shri Hitendra Goyal, Partner of the assessee firm, in his statement, admitted to surrender

ACIT, PAOTA C ROAD vs. VARAHA INFRA LIMITED, PAOTA B ROAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 160/JODH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Rathod Kamlesh Jayantbhaithe Acit Vs M/S. Vardha Infra Ltd. Room No. 215, Aayakar Bhawan 6 Jalam Vilas Scheme Paota C Road, Jodhpur Paota B Road, Jodhpur (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaccv 7972 K

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40

270A of the Act, and it is not pressed by the appellant, this ground is, therefore, dismissed. 8.9. GoA no. 9- "The appellant craves liberty to add, amend, alter or modify any of its grounds of appeals on or before its hearing before CIT(A).” This ground, being general in nature is dismissed. 9. In the result, the appeal