ITO, WARD, PHALODI, PHALODI vs. M/S RAMA ALLURE LLP, JODHPUR

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: The Date, The Appeal Is Finally Heard.”

2) Dy. CIT v. RohiniBuilders[2003] 127 Taxman 523/[2002] 256 ITR 360 (Guj.) and Zafa Ahmed & Co. v. CIT [2013] 30taxmann.com 267/214 Taxman 440 (All.). G. 1982 - Nanak Chandra Laxman Das vs. CIT – Allahabad HC [9 Taxman 252] - Annexure XVIII “There-was no provision in the 1922 Act corresponding to this section. The section, however, gives

MR. NEERAJ PALIWAL,RAJSAMAND vs. ITO, WARD-2, RAJSAMAND

In the result, all these appeals of the assessee are allowed