BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “section 68”+ Section 168clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi662Mumbai485Karnataka459Bangalore190Ahmedabad126Jaipur101Chennai83Hyderabad69Kolkata56Calcutta53Chandigarh46Pune43Indore41Raipur33Surat32Telangana29Ranchi28Guwahati21Cochin21Visakhapatnam20Nagpur13Lucknow13SC9Patna8Rajkot8Dehradun8Rajasthan7Allahabad6Jodhpur4Amritsar4Agra3Orissa3Jabalpur3Cuttack2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 1485Section 143(3)4Section 153A4Addition to Income4Section 683Natural Justice3Cash Deposit2

M/S BHAGIRATH DAIRY PRIVATE LIMITED,NAGAUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, NAGAUR

The appeal is allowed

ITA 755/JODH/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur26 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon’Ble & Shri Sudhir Pareek, Hon’Ble

Section 131Section 143(3)Section 44Section 68Section 69Section 69A

section 68 of the act and and added to the income of the assessee. In addition to the cash-credits, the AO has further made addition of Rs. 8,56,000/- u/s 69A of the by treating the deposit in the name of Sh. Mohan Ram Choudhary and Smt.Tulchi Devi

M/S. RASIK PRIYA RESORTS PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 199/JODH/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur30 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.199 & 200/Jodh/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2012-13 & 2013-14 M/S.Rasik Priya Resorts Pvt. The Deputy Commissioner Ltd., V Of Income Tax, 11, Mangal Complex, S. Central Circle-2, Udaipur. Saifan Choraha, Bedla Road, Udaipur. Pan: Aafcr 5546 N Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue Assessee By Shri Rakesh Lodha – Ca Revenue By Smt. Alka Rajvanshi Jain – Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 10/08/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 30/10/2023

Section 153A

168/- in A.Y.2011-12 and Rs.1,93,592/- for A.Y.2012-13. He has heavy borrowings. The ld.AR has not filed any details before usto prove creditworthiness of Mr.Mangilar Gurjar. The ld.AR has not filed any documents to rebut findings of ld.CIT(A). M/s.Rasik Priya Resorts Pvt. Ltd.,[A] 3.1 Mr.Naresh Trivedi has also not filed any Return of Income, has not explained

M/S. RASIK PRIYA RESORTS PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 200/JODH/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur30 Oct 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.199 & 200/Jodh/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2012-13 & 2013-14 M/S.Rasik Priya Resorts Pvt. The Deputy Commissioner Ltd., V Of Income Tax, 11, Mangal Complex, S. Central Circle-2, Udaipur. Saifan Choraha, Bedla Road, Udaipur. Pan: Aafcr 5546 N Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue Assessee By Shri Rakesh Lodha – Ca Revenue By Smt. Alka Rajvanshi Jain – Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 10/08/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 30/10/2023

Section 153A

168/- in A.Y.2011-12 and Rs.1,93,592/- for A.Y.2012-13. He has heavy borrowings. The ld.AR has not filed any details before usto prove creditworthiness of Mr.Mangilar Gurjar. The ld.AR has not filed any documents to rebut findings of ld.CIT(A). M/s.Rasik Priya Resorts Pvt. Ltd.,[A] 3.1 Mr.Naresh Trivedi has also not filed any Return of Income, has not explained

SMT. PUSHPA CHHAJER,JODHPUR vs. ACIT,CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 136/JODH/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur02 Aug 2023AY 2014-15
Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 234B

68, where any sum is found credited in the books of the assessee for any previous year, the same may be charged to income-tax as the income of the assessee of that previous year if the explanation offered by the assessee about the nature and source thereof is in the opinion of the Assessing Officer, not satisfactory. In such