SANTOSH SHARMA,JODHPUR vs. ITO, WARD-3(1), JODHPUR
In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 859/JODH/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur18 Aug 2025AY 2012-13
Bench: The Tribunal. The Assessee Has Moved A Condonation Petition Explaining That The Delay Was Caused Due To Non-Receipt Of Communication From The Earlier Representative, Who Neither Apprised The Assessee Of The Appellate Outcome Nor Advised Timely Remedial Action. It Has Been Further Submitted That Upon Obtaining Knowledge Of The Order, The Assessee Promptly Engaged New Counsel & Has Been Diligently Pursuing The Matter. A Prayer Was Made To Condone The Delay In The Interest Of Justice.
For Appellant: Shri Amit Kothari, C.AFor Respondent: Smt. Anuradha, Addl. CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68
section 68 of the Act were sustained.
2. At the outset, it is noted that there is a delay of 217 days in filing the present appeal before the Tribunal. The assessee has moved a condonation petition explaining that the delay was caused due to non-receipt of communication from the earlier representative, who neither apprised the assessee
