BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 153Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi818Mumbai209Bangalore102Chandigarh102Jaipur89Chennai79Cochin64Hyderabad41Nagpur38Patna30Agra28Amritsar27Guwahati24Pune22Ranchi22Allahabad22Dehradun18Indore16Surat12Raipur12Lucknow11Ahmedabad9Kolkata3Cuttack3Jodhpur3Karnataka2Visakhapatnam1Jabalpur1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 1534Section 153A4Section 1474Section 1323Section 143(3)3Addition to Income3Section 1482Section 153C2

SHRI BHANWAR LAL,JODHPUR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result the appeals of the assessee ITA Nos

ITA 417/JODH/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur26 Jun 2025AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Rajendra Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ajey Malik, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153ASection 68

Section 68 on the basis of loose\npapers found during search in this case indicating assessee's\ntransaction with a company, when assesse not only denied having\nany dealing with the said company but also produced all necessary\ndetails for AO to make necessary inquiries and a letter from\ndirector of that company confirming that the said company

SHRI JITENDRA OJHA ,SIROHI vs. ITO,, SIROHI

In the result appeal of assessee is allowed in terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 484/JODH/2018[Shri Jitendra Ojha ]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur19 Mar 2020

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma, Accountant Mrmber Shri Jiterndra Ojha Vs The Ito, S/O Sh. Mangi Lal Ojha , Sirohi. Chhoti Brahmpuri, Sirohi.

Section 132Section 139Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(1)Section 149Section 153Section 153ASection 153C

153D. In not doing so the ld. AO had incorrectly and unlawfully acquired jurisdiction u/s 147 of the Act by overlooking the mandatory provision of Sec. 153 which starts with non-obstante clause i.e.:- " Notwithstanding anything contained in section 139, section 147, section 148, section 149, section, where the Assessing Officer is satisfied that " ............... Since

INDU BALA PORWAL,UDAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRE CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR

In the result, ground no 5, 9 and 11 appeal is also allowed in favor as indicated above

ITA 173/JODH/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur18 Jun 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member), DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

Section 132Section 153Section 153ASection 250

153D of the Act. 10. We note that AO has recorded that the Assessment Order has been passed with the approval of Ld. Additional Commissioner of Tax, Central Range, Udaipur vide letter no. 700 dated 30.09.2021. 11. The Assessee has assailed this issue before the Ld. CIT(A), which has dealt with this issue in Para No. 6 from page