BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 153B(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi490Mumbai323Jaipur117Chennai115Hyderabad75Cochin71Bangalore70Chandigarh42Guwahati38Patna26Pune26Visakhapatnam21Allahabad21Ahmedabad16Agra12Dehradun10Indore9Nagpur9Surat9Lucknow8Karnataka7Rajkot5Amritsar4Raipur3Jodhpur3Cuttack3SC2Kolkata2Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 2636Section 1474Section 143(3)3Section 153A3Section 1482Section 153C2Revision u/s 2632

VISHNU GOYAL,JODHPUR vs. PR. CIT, CENTRAL, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 46/JODH/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur04 Nov 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri B. R. Baskaran & Shri Sandeep Gosain

Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

section as 143(3) r.w.s 153B(1)(a) of the Act). The Ld PCIT, upon examination of assessment records both the years, took the view that the assessing officer has not conducted proper enquiries/verification while passing the assessment orders. Accordingly, he initiated revision proceedings u/s 263 of the Act. 3. We shall first take up the revision order passed

VISHNU GOYAL,JODHPUR vs. PR. CIT, CENTRAL, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 47/JODH/2022[2013-14]Status: Disposed
ITAT Jodhpur
04 Nov 2022
AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri B. R. Baskaran & Shri Sandeep Gosain

Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

section as 143(3) r.w.s 153B(1)(a) of the Act). The Ld PCIT, upon examination of assessment records both the years, took the view that the assessing officer has not conducted proper enquiries/verification while passing the assessment orders. Accordingly, he initiated revision proceedings u/s 263 of the Act. 3. We shall first take up the revision order passed

SHRI JITENDRA OJHA ,SIROHI vs. ITO,, SIROHI

In the result appeal of assessee is allowed in terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 484/JODH/2018[Shri Jitendra Ojha ]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur19 Mar 2020

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma, Accountant Mrmber Shri Jiterndra Ojha Vs The Ito, S/O Sh. Mangi Lal Ojha , Sirohi. Chhoti Brahmpuri, Sirohi.

Section 132Section 139Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(1)Section 149Section 153Section 153ASection 153C

153B &153D. In not doing so the ld. AO had incorrectly and unlawfully acquired jurisdiction u/s 147 of the Act by overlooking the mandatory provision of Sec. 153 which starts with non-obstante clause i.e.:- " Notwithstanding anything contained in section 139, section 147, section 148, section 149, section, where the Assessing Officer is satisfied that