BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “section 68”+ Section 153Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi495Mumbai325Jaipur118Chennai115Hyderabad75Cochin71Bangalore70Chandigarh42Guwahati38Visakhapatnam29Pune27Patna26Allahabad21Ahmedabad16Agra12Dehradun10Nagpur9Surat9Indore9Lucknow8Karnataka7Raipur5Rajkot5Amritsar4Jodhpur4Cuttack3Kolkata3SC2Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 2636Section 143(3)4Section 1474Section 153A3Section 1393Section 1482Section 153C2Section 1322Addition to Income2Revision u/s 263

RITU ROAD LINES,JODHPUR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-02, JODHPUR

Appeal of the assessee is Partly Allowed

ITA 34/JODH/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur08 Nov 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.34/Jodh/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Ritu Road Lines, The Dcit, Plot No.12-14, Nakoda V Central Circle-2, Jodhpur. Industrial Area, Basni, S Jodhpur – 342001. Pan: Aaafr9440D Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue Assessee By Shri Amit Kothari – Ar Revenue By Smt. Alka Rajvanshi Jain – Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 16/08/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 08/11/2023

Section 115BSection 132Section 139Section 143(3)Section 234BSection 250Section 270A(1)

153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 31.12.2019. The grounds of appeal are as under : “1. The ld.CIT(A) has erred in upholding the order passed by Id. AO u/sl43(3) without appreciating the facts of the case. The order so made is bad in law and bad on facts. Ritu Road Lines [A] 2. The ld.CIT

2

VISHNU GOYAL,JODHPUR vs. PR. CIT, CENTRAL, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 46/JODH/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur04 Nov 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri B. R. Baskaran & Shri Sandeep Gosain

Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

section as 143(3) r.w.s 153B(1)(a) of the Act). The Ld PCIT, upon examination of assessment records both the years, took the view that the assessing officer has not conducted proper enquiries/verification while passing the assessment orders. Accordingly, he initiated revision proceedings u/s 263 of the Act. 3. We shall first take up the revision order passed

VISHNU GOYAL,JODHPUR vs. PR. CIT, CENTRAL, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 47/JODH/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur04 Nov 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri B. R. Baskaran & Shri Sandeep Gosain

Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

section as 143(3) r.w.s 153B(1)(a) of the Act). The Ld PCIT, upon examination of assessment records both the years, took the view that the assessing officer has not conducted proper enquiries/verification while passing the assessment orders. Accordingly, he initiated revision proceedings u/s 263 of the Act. 3. We shall first take up the revision order passed

SHRI JITENDRA OJHA ,SIROHI vs. ITO,, SIROHI

In the result appeal of assessee is allowed in terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 484/JODH/2018[Shri Jitendra Ojha ]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur19 Mar 2020

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma, Accountant Mrmber Shri Jiterndra Ojha Vs The Ito, S/O Sh. Mangi Lal Ojha , Sirohi. Chhoti Brahmpuri, Sirohi.

Section 132Section 139Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(1)Section 149Section 153Section 153ASection 153C

153B &153D. In not doing so the ld. AO had incorrectly and unlawfully acquired jurisdiction u/s 147 of the Act by overlooking the mandatory provision of Sec. 153 which starts with non-obstante clause i.e.:- " Notwithstanding anything contained in section 139, section 147, section 148, section 149, section, where the Assessing Officer is satisfied that