BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “section 68”+ Permanent Establishmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi978Mumbai659Karnataka431Bangalore214Chennai204Kolkata183Ahmedabad91Jaipur85Chandigarh54Telangana53Indore45Raipur42Cochin36SC23Visakhapatnam21Rajkot18Calcutta17Pune16Hyderabad15Lucknow15Surat13Dehradun12Cuttack11Guwahati10Varanasi8Nagpur8Rajasthan6Agra5Jodhpur4Amritsar4Orissa3Allahabad3Panaji2Uttarakhand2Ranchi1Andhra Pradesh1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 14710Section 686Section 69C4Addition to Income4Section 1442Section 271(1)(b)2Section 1482Section 62Disallowance2Unexplained Cash Credit

M/S. SUPER SHIV SHAKTI MINCHEM PVT. LTD.,JODHPUR vs. ITO, WARD-3, , BHILWARA

In the result, both the above appeals filed by the Assessee are dismissed

ITA 21/JODH/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur17 Jun 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Goutam Chand Baid, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Karni Dan, Addl. CIT (Sr. D.R)
Section 147Section 148Section 6Section 68Section 69C

section 68 if the overall transaction lacks credibility and commercial rationale. The onus is higher where entities are found to be part of an accommodation entry racket, and in such circumstances, the test of human probability must prevail over formality. 14. The assessee has placed on record a set of documents in support of the receipt of share capital, including

2
Reassessment2
Reopening of Assessment2

M/S. SUPER SHIV SHAKTI MINCHEM PVT. LTD.,JODHPUR vs. ITO, WARD-3, , BHILWARA

In the result, both the above appeals filed by the Assessee are dismissed

ITA 20/JODH/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur17 Jun 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Goutam Chand Baid, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Karni Dan, Addl. CIT (Sr. D.R)
Section 147Section 148Section 6Section 68Section 69C

section 68 if the overall transaction lacks credibility and commercial rationale. The onus is higher where entities are found to be part of an accommodation entry racket, and in such circumstances, the test of human probability must prevail over formality. 14. The assessee has placed on record a set of documents in support of the receipt of share capital, including

DCIT, CIRCLE, BHILWARA vs. M/S. SAILEELA SYNTHETICS PVT. LD. , BHILWARA

The appeal stands dismissed

ITA 279/JODH/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur21 Dec 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am (Hearing Through Video Conferencing Mode) आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.279/Jodh/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) Dcit- Bhilwara Circle M/S. Saileela Synthetics Pvt. Ltd. बनाम/ Shastri Nagar, Bhilwara 147, New Cloth Market Rajasthan. Pur Road, Bhilwara Vs. Rajasthan-311 001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aadcs-1103-N (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) :

For Appellant: Shri Rajendra Jain (Advocate) & MsFor Respondent: Shri A.S. Yadav- Ld. CIT- DR
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(va)Section 68

Permanent Account Number (PAN) of the share applicants. However, upon perusal of details so filed, it was noted that eleven (11) entities were located at the same or nearby addresses. Notices u/s 133(6) were issued to confirm the transactions, however, the same did not elicit any satisfactory response. Accordingly, the assessee was required to demonstrate the fulfillment of ingredients

MANOHAR SINGH,JODHPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(3),, JODHPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 159/JODH/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur04 Oct 2023AY 2013-14
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 234ASection 234BSection 271(1)(b)

Section 271(1)(b) and 271(1)(c) of the Act being premature at this stage, both the grounds are dismissed. 6. The ground No. 7 raised by the appellant is regarding charging of interest amounting to Rs. 24,49.836/- u/s 234B of the Act. This being consequential in nature, the AO is directed to allow relief as per this