BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 234Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai259Delhi162Bangalore125Ahmedabad57Hyderabad55Jaipur39Pune23Chennai19Raipur19Rajkot15Kolkata13Lucknow12Amritsar11Agra9Dehradun9Chandigarh8Nagpur8Guwahati7Jodhpur6Indore6Visakhapatnam6Allahabad5Cochin5Patna4Cuttack4Surat4Telangana2Panaji1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 15420Section 14810Section 133A6Addition to Income6Survey u/s 133A6Section 2505Section 425Section 292B5Section 189(3)

KANAK KUMAR JAIN L/H OF PARTNER OF M/S. KESARIYAJI FILLING STATION,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR

ITA 67/JODH/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 May 2025AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Lodha (CA)For Respondent: Shri Karni Dan, Addl. CIT
Section 133ASection 148Section 154Section 189(3)Section 234ASection 234CSection 250Section 292BSection 42

234C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 7. That the appellant may kindly be permitted to raise any additional or alternate grounds at or before the time of appeal. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a L/H of Partner of M/s. Keshariyaji Filling Station, a dealer of Bharat Petroleum. The assessee firm filed

5
Section 234A5
Business Income5
Rectification u/s 1545

KANAK KUMAR JAIN L/H OF PARTNER OF M/S. KESARIYAJI FILLING STATION,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR

ITA 63/JODH/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 May 2025AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Lodha (CA)For Respondent: Shri Karni Dan, Addl. CIT
Section 133ASection 148Section 154Section 189(3)Section 234ASection 234CSection 250Section 292BSection 42

234C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 7. That the appellant may kindly be permitted to raise any additional or alternate grounds at or before the time of appeal. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a L/H of Partner of M/s. Keshariyaji Filling Station, a dealer of Bharat Petroleum. The assessee firm filed

KANAK KUMAR JAIN L/H OF PARTNER OF M/S. KESARIYAJI FILLING STATION,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR

ITA 66/JODH/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 May 2025AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Lodha (CA)For Respondent: Shri Karni Dan, Addl. CIT
Section 133ASection 148Section 154Section 189(3)Section 234ASection 234CSection 250Section 292BSection 42

234C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 7. That the appellant may kindly be permitted to raise any additional or alternate grounds at or before the time of appeal. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a L/H of Partner of M/s. Keshariyaji Filling Station, a dealer of Bharat Petroleum. The assessee firm filed

KANAK KUMAR JAIN L/H OF PARTNER OF M/S. KESARIYAJI FILLING STATION,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR

ITA 64/JODH/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 May 2025AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Lodha (CA)For Respondent: Shri Karni Dan, Addl. CIT
Section 133ASection 148Section 154Section 189(3)Section 234ASection 234CSection 250Section 292BSection 42

234C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 7. That the appellant may kindly be permitted to raise any additional or alternate grounds at or before the time of appeal. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a L/H of Partner of M/s. Keshariyaji Filling Station, a dealer of Bharat Petroleum. The assessee firm filed

KANAK KUMAR JAIN L/H OF PARTNER OF M/S. KESARIYAJI FILLING STATION,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR

ITA 65/JODH/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 May 2025AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Lodha (CA)For Respondent: Shri Karni Dan, Addl. CIT
Section 133ASection 148Section 154Section 189(3)Section 234ASection 234CSection 250Section 292BSection 42

234C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 7. That the appellant may kindly be permitted to raise any additional or alternate grounds at or before the time of appeal. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a L/H of Partner of M/s. Keshariyaji Filling Station, a dealer of Bharat Petroleum. The assessee firm filed

SMT. PUSHPA CHHAJER,JODHPUR vs. ACIT,CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 136/JODH/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur02 Aug 2023AY 2014-15
Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 234B

234C. 14. That the petitioner may kindly be permitted to raise any additional or alternative ground at or before the time of hearing. 15. The petitioner prays for justice and relief.” 3. The facts as culled out from the record are that the return of income for the A.Y 2014-15 was electronically furnished on 25.11.2014 declaring a total income