BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 234B(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai435Delhi431Bangalore207Ahmedabad103Hyderabad73Jaipur65Chennai48Kolkata41Pune36Indore19Rajkot18Lucknow18Nagpur16Surat16Chandigarh14Agra13Amritsar13Visakhapatnam13Patna12Dehradun10Cochin8Ranchi6Allahabad5Cuttack5Karnataka4Jodhpur3Telangana2Raipur1Panaji1Varanasi1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 1486Section 143(3)3Addition to Income3Section 1532Section 153A2Section 234B2Section 133A2Survey u/s 133A2

LEELA RAM METHANI,BHILWARA vs. ITO, WARD-1, BHILWARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 170/JODH/2019[2911-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur24 Mar 2023AY 2911-12

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad170/Jodh/2019 (Assessment Year- 2011-12) Vs Shri Leela Ram Methani, The Ito Near Bank Of Baroda, Ward-1, Gulabpura, Bhilwara Bhilwara (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Akrpm2107M

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234B

1. The impugned additions of Rs.25,25,000 made in the order u/s 143(3)/147 dated 20.12.2018 are bad in law and on facts of the case, for want of jurisdiction and various other reasons and hence the same kindly be deleted. 2. The Ld.AO erred in law as well as on the facts of the case in charging

SMT. PUSHPA CHHAJER,JODHPUR vs. ACIT,CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 136/JODH/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur02 Aug 2023AY 2014-15
Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 234B

234B and 234C. 14. That the petitioner may kindly be permitted to raise any additional or alternative ground at or before the time of hearing. 15. The petitioner prays for justice and relief.” 3. The facts as culled out from the record are that the return of income for the A.Y 2014-15 was electronically furnished on 25.11.2014 declaring

INDU BALA PORWAL,UDAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRE CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR

In the result, ground no 5, 9 and 11 appeal is also allowed in favor as indicated above

ITA 173/JODH/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur18 Jun 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member), DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

Section 132Section 153Section 153ASection 250

234B of the Act. 25. that the above grounds are independent and without prejudice to one another. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, alter. Revise and modify any of the grounds of appeal on, before or in the course of hearing of the appeal.” 3. Ground No. 1 and 2 are general in nature and accordingly, shall be adjudicated