BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Rectification u/s 154clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi174Mumbai138Chennai97Bangalore89Jaipur50Chandigarh41Kolkata37Lucknow24Nagpur18Pune16Ahmedabad14Cochin10Indore10Hyderabad9Visakhapatnam9Agra8Patna7Raipur7Jodhpur6Allahabad5Surat5Amritsar3Panaji3Karnataka3Telangana2Rajkot2Jabalpur2Uttarakhand1Guwahati1SC1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 15420Section 1487Addition to Income6Section 2505Section 425Section 292B5Section 189(3)5Section 234A5Section 234C

SHAHNAJ,NEAR BHERUDANJI WELL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, INCOME TAX OFFICE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 712/JODH/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Dr Mitha Lal Meenasmt. Shanaj Vs The Ito W/O Shri Aslam Khan Ward-2, Churu, Near Bherudan Ji Well,Ward No. 22 Churu Sardarshahar,Churu – 331 403 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Fpmps 3570 D

Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 50CSection 54F

reassessment proceeding U/s 147 of the Act without obtaining proper satisfaction and sanction from the superior authority U/s 151 of the Act. I have carefully considered the facts and submissions of the Learned AR and the decisions relied on by him. This is 3 SMT SHAHNAJ VS ITO, WARD-2, CHURU the case where originally the appellant

5
Survey u/s 133A5
Rectification u/s 1545

KANAK KUMAR JAIN L/H OF PARTNER OF M/S. KESARIYAJI FILLING STATION,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 66/JODH/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 May 2025AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Lodha (CA)For Respondent: Shri Karni Dan, Addl. CIT
Section 133ASection 148Section 154Section 189(3)Section 234ASection 234CSection 250Section 292BSection 42

rectification\napplication made by appellant u/s 154, ignoring the apparent mistakes that had\noccurred in the appellate order, including incorrect application of law that goes\nagainst canons of well established fundamentals of partnership law.\n2. That the ld. CIT (Appeal), Udaipur has erred in law and on facts in confirming M/s.\nKeshariyaji Filling Station, a partnership firm

KANAK KUMAR JAIN L/H OF PARTNER OF M/S. KESARIYAJI FILLING STATION,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 67/JODH/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 May 2025AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Lodha (CA)For Respondent: Shri Karni Dan, Addl. CIT
Section 133ASection 148Section 154Section 189(3)Section 234ASection 234CSection 250Section 292BSection 42

rectification\napplication made by appellant u/s 154, ignoring the apparent mistakes that had\noccurred in the appellate order, including incorrect application of law that goes\nagainst canons of well established fundamentals of partnership law.\n2. That the ld. CIT (Appeal), Udaipur has erred in law and on facts in confirming M/s.\nKeshariyaji Filling Station, a partnership firm

KANAK KUMAR JAIN L/H OF PARTNER OF M/S. KESARIYAJI FILLING STATION,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 64/JODH/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 May 2025AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Lodha (CA)For Respondent: Shri Karni Dan, Addl. CIT
Section 133ASection 148Section 154Section 189(3)Section 234ASection 234CSection 250Section 292BSection 42

rectification\napplication made by appellant u/s 154, ignoring the apparent mistakes that had\noccurred in the appellate order, including incorrect application of law that goes\nagainst canons of well established fundamentals of partnership law.\n2. That the ld. CIT (Appeal), Udaipur has erred in law and on facts in confirming M/s.\nKeshariyaji Filling Station, a partnership firm

KANAK KUMAR JAIN L/H OF PARTNER OF M/S. KESARIYAJI FILLING STATION,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 65/JODH/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 May 2025AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Lodha (CA)For Respondent: Shri Karni Dan, Addl. CIT
Section 133ASection 148Section 154Section 189(3)Section 234ASection 234CSection 250Section 292BSection 42

rectification\napplication made by appellant u/s 154, ignoring the apparent mistakes that had\noccurred in the appellate order, including incorrect application of law that goes\nagainst canons of well established fundamentals of partnership law.\n2. That the ld. CIT (Appeal), Udaipur has erred in law and on facts in confirming M/s.\nKeshariyaji Filling Station, a partnership firm

KANAK KUMAR JAIN L/H OF PARTNER OF M/S. KESARIYAJI FILLING STATION,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 63/JODH/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 May 2025AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Lodha (CA)For Respondent: Shri Karni Dan, Addl. CIT
Section 133ASection 148Section 154Section 189(3)Section 234ASection 234CSection 250Section 292BSection 42

rectification\napplication made by appellant u/s 154, ignoring the apparent mistakes that had\noccurred in the appellate order, including incorrect application of law that goes\nagainst canons of well established fundamentals of partnership law.\n2. That the ld. CIT (Appeal), Udaipur has erred in law and on facts in confirming M/s.\nKeshariyaji Filling Station, a partnership firm