BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Condonation of Delayclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai356Mumbai333Delhi295Kolkata239Ahmedabad214Pune164Jaipur148Hyderabad135Bangalore126Surat83Visakhapatnam71Amritsar63Chandigarh51Indore50Raipur42Patna38Cuttack35Nagpur34Lucknow31Cochin30Rajkot27Agra16Guwahati14Allahabad7Varanasi6Telangana5Jabalpur4Dehradun3Himachal Pradesh2Karnataka2Orissa2Panaji2Jodhpur2SC1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 1442Section 1472Reassessment2

LAXMAN SINGH SOLANKI (FIRM),PALI vs. ITO, , PALI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 795/JODH/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur30 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Amit Kothari, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar Gehlot, Addl. CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 194ASection 194C

u/s 194C). As there was no response to various statutory notices, the Assessing Officer completed the assessment ex parte under section 147 r.w.s. 144/144B on 27.03.2022 determining income at Rs.1,03,78,887/- by disallowing the said expenses. 4. Against the order of the Ld. AO The appeal before the CIT(A) was filed with a delay of 129 days

SHRI YASIN KHAN,CHURU vs. ITO,WARD-1, CHURU

The appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 74/JODH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur21 Dec 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am (Hearing Though Video Conferencing Mode) आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.74/Jodh/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2010-11) Sh. Yasin Khan Income Tax Officerward-1 बनाम/ Ward No.25 Churu Churu, Rajasthan-331 001. Vs. Jaipur, Rajasthan-331 011. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.Cakpk-2504-B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) :

For Appellant: Shri Amit Kothari (CA)- Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri K.C. Badhok - Ld. CIT- DR
Section 144

u/s 144 r.w.s 147 of the Act on 21/02/2016. The learned first appellate authority has dismissed the appeal of the assessee for want of condonation of delay of 715 days. 2 Sh. Yasin Khan Assessment Year: 2010-11 2.1 The relevant facts are that during assessment proceedings, it transpired that the assessee sold certain immoveable property Khasra No. 814 & 1642/806