BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 80Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Surat8Pune7Mumbai5Jodhpur4Chennai4Kolkata2Delhi2Ahmedabad1Indore1Rajkot1Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 35A22Section 1489Section 115Section 801A(7)4Disallowance4Addition to Income4Section 80J3Section 1393Section 143(1)3Deduction

APNA GHAR ASHRAM,JODHPUR vs. DDIT, CPC / ITO, WARD (EXEMPTION), BANGALORE / JODHPUR

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 730/JODH/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur02 Jun 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Rajendra Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Karni Dan, Addl. CIT(Sr. D.R)
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)

reassessment would have to be based on the formation of an opinion that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. That primordial condition would clearly not be satisfied on the mere allegation of a delayed digital filing of Form 10. 29. Quite apart from the above, we also bear in mind the underlying intent of Section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1, JODHPUR , JODHPUR vs. JODHPUR HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD., JODHPUR

3
Limitation/Time-bar3
Section 12A2

In the result, the revenue appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 545/JODH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur26 Jun 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon'Ble & Anikesh Banerjee, Hon'Ble

Section 139Section 148Section 35ASection 801A(7)Section 80J

80J on the basis of the such report. 3 The Ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate the fact that in the present case the assessee has failed to offer a satisfactory explanation for his failure to submit the audit report in Form 10CCB in time. 4. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) is justified in deleting the disallowance made

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR , JODHPUR vs. JODHPUR HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD., JODHPUR

In the result, the revenue appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 541/JODH/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur26 Jun 2025AY 2016-17
Section 139Section 148Section 35ASection 801A(7)Section 80J

80J on the basis\nof the such report.\n3 The Ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate the fact that in the present case\nthe assessee has failed to offer a satisfactory explanation for his failure to\nsubmit the audit report in Form 10CCB in time.\n4. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) is justified in holding that the assessee

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR , JODHPUR vs. JODHPUR HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD., JODHPUR

In the result, the revenue appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 544/JODH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur26 Jun 2025AY 2017-18
Section 139Section 148Section 35ASection 801A(7)Section 80J

80J on the basis\nof the such report.\n3 The Id. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate the fact that in the present case\nthe assessee has failed to offer a satisfactory explanation for his failure to\nsubmit the audit report in Form 10CCB in time.\n4. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) is justified in deleting the disallowance made\nu/s