ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR , JODHPUR vs. JODHPUR HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD., JODHPUR

In the result, the revenue appeals in ITA Nos

7) of the\nact, the provisions of section 801A had been imported and it mandates the\nrequirement of submission of the audit report as required under the Act. From\nthe details submitted by the assessee it is stated by AO that the bifurcation of\nassets of the specified business cannot be ascertained. The main contention of\nthe AO while disallowing

AJMER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,AJMER vs. CIT(EXEMPTION)/ ITO (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR / JODHPUR

In the result, the stay application filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharatshri Manish Borad

7 | P a g e sec. 263 of the Act to AO to do de-novo assessment on the issues discussed after providing proper opportunity of being heard to the assessee and making proper inquiry and arrive at a factually and legally correct finding on these issues." Thus, feeling aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal. GOA 1 to 4: Order

NAHAR COLOURS AND COATINHGS PRIVATE LIMITED,UDAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOMETAX, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

801A was 44.25% whereas the NP rate of non-eligible business was only 9.75%. The intention was basically to ascertain and examine as to whether the claim u/s 80IA was legally correct and as to whether the common expenses related to both segment of business had been correctly allocated or there was any diversion of expenses of eligible business