LEELA RAM METHANI,BHILWARA vs. ITO, WARD-1, BHILWARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad170/Jodh/2019 (Assessment Year- 2011-12) Vs Shri Leela Ram Methani, The Ito Near Bank Of Baroda, Ward-1, Gulabpura, Bhilwara Bhilwara (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Akrpm2107M

234B of the Act. The appellant totally denies it liability of charging of any such interest. Te interest, so charged, being contrary to the provisions of law and facts, kindly be deleted in full. 3. The appellant prays your honour indulgences to add, amend or alter of or any of the grounds of the appeal on or before the date

SMT. PUSHPA CHHAJER,JODHPUR vs. ACIT,CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

234B and 234C. 14. That the petitioner may kindly be permitted to raise any additional or alternative ground at or before the time of hearing. 15. The petitioner prays for justice and relief.” 3. The facts as culled out from the record are that the return of income for the A.Y 2014-15 was electronically furnished on 25.11.2014 declaring

INDU BALA PORWAL,UDAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRE CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR

In the result, ground no 5, 9 and 11 appeal is also allowed in favor as indicated above

Bench: DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member), DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

234B of the Act. 25. that the above grounds are independent and without prejudice to one another. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, alter. Revise and modify any of the grounds of appeal on, before or in the course of hearing of the appeal.” 3. Ground No. 1 and 2 are general in nature and accordingly, shall be adjudicated