BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 220(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai194Delhi164Chennai125Bangalore72Jaipur67Chandigarh59Ahmedabad59Hyderabad58Raipur41Kolkata39Guwahati27Pune24Patna21Rajkot16Cuttack14Cochin14Indore12Lucknow8Visakhapatnam6SC6Surat6Amritsar5Jodhpur4Ranchi2Allahabad2Nagpur2Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 26315Section 143(3)8Section 1488Section 143(2)5Section 80I5Section 1474Section 143(1)3Section 801A2Deduction2Disallowance

AJMER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,AJMER vs. CIT(EXEMPTION)/ ITO (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR / JODHPUR

In the result, the stay application filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 89/JODH/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur22 Mar 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kul Bharatshri Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263

2) does not include a particular issue with respect to which income has escaped assessment, he may nonetheless, assess or reassess the income in respect of any issue which has escaped assessment and which comes to his notice subsequently in the course of the proceedings under the section." 32 | P a g e 7.3.3. CIT vs. Shri Ram Singh

NAHAR COLOURS AND COATINHGS PRIVATE LIMITED,UDAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOMETAX, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

2
Addition to Income2
ITA 140/JODH/2023[2018-19]Status: Disposed
ITAT Jodhpur
09 Aug 2023
AY 2018-19
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 801ASection 80I

220 ITR 456/[1994] 77 Taxman 331 (Del.)) 1.2. There can be no doubt that merely on the basis of presumption or surmise or suspicion, an order under section263 cannot be passed. The Tribunal failed to appreciate that in this case the inference drawn by the Commissioner was not based either on presumptions or surmises or suspicion. Therefore, the Tribunal

HEERA LAL KASARA,UDAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-2(1), UDAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 303/JODH/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur25 Jun 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Its Hearing Before Your Honours.”

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

220/- vide his assessment order passed under section 143(3) of the I.T. Act, 1961 dated 19.07.2011. The case of the assessee was reopened under section 147 of the IT Act, 1961 on the basis of guidelines of Indian Newspaper Society issued by INS. The reason for reopening of the assessment was that the GP as per guidelines of Indian

SMT. PUSHPA CHHAJER,JODHPUR vs. ACIT,CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 136/JODH/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur02 Aug 2023AY 2014-15
Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 234B

Section 148 of the Act and in the absence of a notice to the assessee against whom reassessment order is proposed, the said order is held to be invalid.” 20 Smt. Pushpa Chhajer q] Further also rely on the decision of Hon’ble ITAT, Jaipur Bench in the case of Charan Singh (P.B. Page 217 to 224). In light