LAXMAN SINGH SOLANKI (FIRM),PALI vs. ITO, , PALI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

section 147 r.w.s. 144/144B on 27.03.2022 determining income at Rs.1,03,78,887/- by disallowing the said expenses. 4. Against the order of the Ld. AO The appeal before the CIT(A) was filed with a delay of 129 days, supported by an affidavit of Shri Dinesh Singh Solanki, partner of the firm, stating that due to his prolonged illness

TARUN MURADIA,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1 UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: DR. MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member), DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

section 153A, the intention of the legislation is clear viz, to provide for assessment in case of search and requisition – When the very purpose of the provision is to make assessment in the case of search or requisition, the assessment should be connected with something found during the search or requisition, viz. Incriminating material which reveals undisclosed income – In case

SUNIL PAGARIA,UDAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-2(1), UDAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

129 taxmann.com 18 (Bom); Piramal Enterprises Ltd .v/s NFAC [2021] 132 taxmann.com 30 (Delhi); Naina lal Kidwai v/s NFAC etc.” Sunil Pagaria vs. ITO 5.1 The ld. AR of the assessee in addition to the above written submission submitted that the assessment in this case u/s 143(3) has already been completed. The ld. AR of the assessee submitted that

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

129 TTJ 255 (Ahd) " Anil Kumar Bhatiya vs. ACIT (2010) 1 ITR (Trib) 484 (Delhi) " Anil Mahavir Gupta vs. ACIT 182 TTTJ (Mum) 265 " Smrutisudha Nayak vs. UOI (2021) 5 NYPCTR 951 (Ori) " PCIT vs. Bhadani Financiers P Ltd (2021) 5 NYPCTR 771 (Delhi) " CIT vs. Deepak Kumar Agarwal (2017) 299 CTR (Bom) 62 " CIT vs. SKS Ispat Power

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

129 TTJ 255 (Ahd) " Anil Kumar Bhatiya vs. ACIT (2010) 1 ITR (Trib) 484 (Delhi) " Anil Mahavir Gupta vs. ACIT 182 TTTJ (Mum) 265 " Smrutisudha Nayak vs. UOI (2021) 5 NYPCTR 951 (Ori) " PCIT vs. Bhadani Financiers P Ltd (2021) 5 NYPCTR 771 (Delhi) " CIT vs. Deepak Kumar Agarwal (2017) 299 CTR (Bom) 62 " CIT vs. SKS Ispat Power

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

129 TTJ 255 (Ahd) " Anil Kumar Bhatiya vs. ACIT (2010) 1 ITR (Trib) 484 (Delhi) " Anil Mahavir Gupta vs. ACIT 182 TTTJ (Mum) 265 " Smrutisudha Nayak vs. UOI (2021) 5 NYPCTR 951 (Ori) " PCIT vs. Bhadani Financiers P Ltd (2021) 5 NYPCTR 771 (Delhi) " CIT vs. Deepak Kumar Agarwal (2017) 299 CTR (Bom) 62 " CIT vs. SKS Ispat Power

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

129 TTJ 255 (Ahd) " Anil Kumar Bhatiya vs. ACIT (2010) 1 ITR (Trib) 484 (Delhi) " Anil Mahavir Gupta vs. ACIT 182 TTTJ (Mum) 265 " Smrutisudha Nayak vs. UOI (2021) 5 NYPCTR 951 (Ori) " PCIT vs. Bhadani Financiers P Ltd (2021) 5 NYPCTR 771 (Delhi) " CIT vs. Deepak Kumar Agarwal (2017) 299 CTR (Bom) 62 " CIT vs. SKS Ispat Power

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

129 TTJ 255 (Ahd) " Anil Kumar Bhatiya vs. ACIT (2010) 1 ITR (Trib) 484 (Delhi) " Anil Mahavir Gupta vs. ACIT 182 TTTJ (Mum) 265 " Smrutisudha Nayak vs. UOI (2021) 5 NYPCTR 951 (Ori) " PCIT vs. Bhadani Financiers P Ltd (2021) 5 NYPCTR 771 (Delhi) " CIT vs. Deepak Kumar Agarwal (2017) 299 CTR (Bom) 62 " CIT vs. SKS Ispat Power

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR vs. M/S MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD., UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

129 TTJ 255 (Ahd) " Anil Kumar Bhatiya vs. ACIT (2010) 1 ITR (Trib) 484 (Delhi) " Anil Mahavir Gupta vs. ACIT 182 TTTJ (Mum) 265 " Smrutisudha Nayak vs. UOI (2021) 5 NYPCTR 951 (Ori) " PCIT vs. Bhadani Financiers P Ltd (2021) 5 NYPCTR 771 (Delhi) " CIT vs. Deepak Kumar Agarwal (2017) 299 CTR (Bom) 62 " CIT vs. SKS Ispat Power

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR vs. M/S MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD., UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

129 TTJ 255 (Ahd) " Anil Kumar Bhatiya vs. ACIT (2010) 1 ITR (Trib) 484 (Delhi) " Anil Mahavir Gupta vs. ACIT 182 TTTJ (Mum) 265 " Smrutisudha Nayak vs. UOI (2021) 5 NYPCTR 951 (Ori) " PCIT vs. Bhadani Financiers P Ltd (2021) 5 NYPCTR 771 (Delhi) " CIT vs. Deepak Kumar Agarwal (2017) 299 CTR (Bom) 62 " CIT vs. SKS Ispat Power

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR vs. M/S MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD., UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

129 TTJ 255 (Ahd) " Anil Kumar Bhatiya vs. ACIT (2010) 1 ITR (Trib) 484 (Delhi) " Anil Mahavir Gupta vs. ACIT 182 TTTJ (Mum) 265 " Smrutisudha Nayak vs. UOI (2021) 5 NYPCTR 951 (Ori) " PCIT vs. Bhadani Financiers P Ltd (2021) 5 NYPCTR 771 (Delhi) " CIT vs. Deepak Kumar Agarwal (2017) 299 CTR (Bom) 62 " CIT vs. SKS Ispat Power

MEWAR HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

129 TTJ 255 (Ahd) " Anil Kumar Bhatiya vs. ACIT (2010) 1 ITR (Trib) 484 (Delhi) " Anil Mahavir Gupta vs. ACIT 182 TTTJ (Mum) 265 " Smrutisudha Nayak vs. UOI (2021) 5 NYPCTR 951 (Ori) " PCIT vs. Bhadani Financiers P Ltd (2021) 5 NYPCTR 771 (Delhi) " CIT vs. Deepak Kumar Agarwal (2017) 299 CTR (Bom) 62 " CIT vs. SKS Ispat Power

JS ENGINEERING WORKS,SAWA, CHITTORGARH vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, CHITTORGARH

In the result, all these 6 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon’Ble & Sudhir Pareek, Hon’Blestay Application No. 8 To 13/Jodh/2024 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos. 620, 621, 622, 624, 625 &628/Jodh/2024) (Assessment Year – 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) Js Engineering Works Dcit, Central Circle, J-16, M/S. Sclj & Associates, Chittorgarh. Lal Kothi Yojana, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur – 302015. Pan No. Aaffj 9260 Q

129 taxmann.com 360, Gujarat High Court Judgment in the case of Kantibhai Dharamshibhai Narola vs. ACIT [2021] 125 taxmann.com 348, Bombey High Court Judgment in case of M/s Akshar Anshul Construction LLP vs. ACIT [2019] 104 taxmann.com 94 and Gujarat High Court in case of Jivraj Tea Ltd vs. ACIT [2020] 116 taxmann.com 27. 6. On the other hand

JS ENGINEERING WORKS,SAWA CHITTORGARH vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, CHITTORGARH

In the result, all these 6 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon’Ble & Sudhir Pareek, Hon’Blestay Application No. 8 To 13/Jodh/2024 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos. 620, 621, 622, 624, 625 &628/Jodh/2024) (Assessment Year – 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) Js Engineering Works Dcit, Central Circle, J-16, M/S. Sclj & Associates, Chittorgarh. Lal Kothi Yojana, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur – 302015. Pan No. Aaffj 9260 Q

129 taxmann.com 360, Gujarat High Court Judgment in the case of Kantibhai Dharamshibhai Narola vs. ACIT [2021] 125 taxmann.com 348, Bombey High Court Judgment in case of M/s Akshar Anshul Construction LLP vs. ACIT [2019] 104 taxmann.com 94 and Gujarat High Court in case of Jivraj Tea Ltd vs. ACIT [2020] 116 taxmann.com 27. 6. On the other hand

JS ENGINEERING WORKS,SAWA, CHITTORGARH vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, CHITTORGARH

In the result, all these 6 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon’Ble & Sudhir Pareek, Hon’Blestay Application No. 8 To 13/Jodh/2024 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos. 620, 621, 622, 624, 625 &628/Jodh/2024) (Assessment Year – 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) Js Engineering Works Dcit, Central Circle, J-16, M/S. Sclj & Associates, Chittorgarh. Lal Kothi Yojana, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur – 302015. Pan No. Aaffj 9260 Q

129 taxmann.com 360, Gujarat High Court Judgment in the case of Kantibhai Dharamshibhai Narola vs. ACIT [2021] 125 taxmann.com 348, Bombey High Court Judgment in case of M/s Akshar Anshul Construction LLP vs. ACIT [2019] 104 taxmann.com 94 and Gujarat High Court in case of Jivraj Tea Ltd vs. ACIT [2020] 116 taxmann.com 27. 6. On the other hand

JS ENGINEERING WORKS,SAWA, CHITTORGARH vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, CHITTORGARH

In the result, all these 6 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon’Ble & Sudhir Pareek, Hon’Blestay Application No. 8 To 13/Jodh/2024 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos. 620, 621, 622, 624, 625 &628/Jodh/2024) (Assessment Year – 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) Js Engineering Works Dcit, Central Circle, J-16, M/S. Sclj & Associates, Chittorgarh. Lal Kothi Yojana, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur – 302015. Pan No. Aaffj 9260 Q

129 taxmann.com 360, Gujarat High Court Judgment in the case of Kantibhai Dharamshibhai Narola vs. ACIT [2021] 125 taxmann.com 348, Bombey High Court Judgment in case of M/s Akshar Anshul Construction LLP vs. ACIT [2019] 104 taxmann.com 94 and Gujarat High Court in case of Jivraj Tea Ltd vs. ACIT [2020] 116 taxmann.com 27. 6. On the other hand

JS ENGINEERING WORKS,SAWA, CHITTORGARH vs. DCIT, CHITTORGARH

In the result, all these 6 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon’Ble & Sudhir Pareek, Hon’Blestay Application No. 8 To 13/Jodh/2024 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos. 620, 621, 622, 624, 625 &628/Jodh/2024) (Assessment Year – 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) Js Engineering Works Dcit, Central Circle, J-16, M/S. Sclj & Associates, Chittorgarh. Lal Kothi Yojana, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur – 302015. Pan No. Aaffj 9260 Q

129 taxmann.com 360, Gujarat High Court Judgment in the case of Kantibhai Dharamshibhai Narola vs. ACIT [2021] 125 taxmann.com 348, Bombey High Court Judgment in case of M/s Akshar Anshul Construction LLP vs. ACIT [2019] 104 taxmann.com 94 and Gujarat High Court in case of Jivraj Tea Ltd vs. ACIT [2020] 116 taxmann.com 27. 6. On the other hand

JS ENGINEERING WORKS,SAWA, CHITTORGARH vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, CHITTORGARH

In the result, all these 6 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Hon’Ble & Sudhir Pareek, Hon’Blestay Application No. 8 To 13/Jodh/2024 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos. 620, 621, 622, 624, 625 &628/Jodh/2024) (Assessment Year – 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) Js Engineering Works Dcit, Central Circle, J-16, M/S. Sclj & Associates, Chittorgarh. Lal Kothi Yojana, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur – 302015. Pan No. Aaffj 9260 Q

129 taxmann.com 360, Gujarat High Court Judgment in the case of Kantibhai Dharamshibhai Narola vs. ACIT [2021] 125 taxmann.com 348, Bombey High Court Judgment in case of M/s Akshar Anshul Construction LLP vs. ACIT [2019] 104 taxmann.com 94 and Gujarat High Court in case of Jivraj Tea Ltd vs. ACIT [2020] 116 taxmann.com 27. 6. On the other hand