UMMAID MAL SINGHVI,JODHPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JODHPUR
Accordingly, legal ground raised by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose
ITA 14/JODH/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur07 Aug 2023AY 2008-09
Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteassessment Year : 2008-09 Shri. Ummaid Mal Singhvi, Acit, C/O Rajendra Jain Advocate, Vs Central Circle-2, 106 Akshay Deep Complex, 5Th Jodhpur B Road, Sardarpura, Jodhpur Pan: Abpps7429D Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Rajendra Jain, Advocate Revenue By Ms. Nidhi Nair, Jcit-Dr Date Of Hearing 07.08.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 07.08.2023 Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Udaipur Dated 30Th September, 2019 For Assessment Year 2008-09 Emanating From The Penalty Order Under Section 271Aaa Of The Income Tax Act Passed By Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2, Jodhpur. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal : Ummaid Mal Singhvi
Section 139(1)Section 271ASection 50C
loss of 12,87,327 vide return u/s 139(1) dated
30/09/2008 is perverse and without verification of the records. The original return of income was filed on 31/07/2008 vide acknowledgement no 38031599 showing total income of 12,87,3271- therefore the imposition of penalty on 2574654/- ( 12,87,327/-+12,87,327/-) is patently erroneous and speaks about arbitrary
