BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 35(1)(ii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,267Mumbai1,013Jaipur298Bangalore272Ahmedabad265Kolkata164Indore162Chennai159Hyderabad130Karnataka128Pune107Chandigarh98Raipur74Surat74Rajkot56Lucknow42Calcutta35Visakhapatnam34Amritsar33Allahabad29Nagpur27Agra18Patna16Cuttack16Cochin15Dehradun14Kerala14Guwahati11SC8Ranchi7Panaji7Jabalpur5Telangana4Varanasi3Rajasthan2Jodhpur2

Key Topics

Section 1482Section 142(1)2Section 402Addition to Income2

RACHNA GOYAL,JODHPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(2), JODHPUR

In the result, the appeal is dismissed

ITA 529/JODH/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur25 Jun 2025AY 2013-14
Section 132Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 250Section 68

ii) In the assessment order the AO has made additions u/s 68 amounting to Rs. 7,45,080/- on account of unexplained cash credits. (iii) In the assessment order there is no finding that any books of accounts were maintained by the assessee and that the alleged amount was found credited in the books of accounts or even

ACIT, PAOTA C ROAD vs. VARAHA INFRA LIMITED, PAOTA B ROAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 160/JODH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Rathod Kamlesh Jayantbhaithe Acit Vs M/S. Vardha Infra Ltd. Room No. 215, Aayakar Bhawan 6 Jalam Vilas Scheme Paota C Road, Jodhpur Paota B Road, Jodhpur (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaccv 7972 K

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40

sections is mandatory but consequential to Income. The A O is directed to allow consequential relief to the assessee while giving effect to this appeal order. 9 The fifth ground of appeal is as under "The Ld. AO has erred in initiating penalty proceedings uis 274 and 271(1)(C) 9.1 The initiation of penalty is not appealable. The ground