BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 271A(1)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai79Indore60Bangalore49Chennai40Jaipur38Delhi36Kolkata30Lucknow21Karnataka21Ahmedabad19Hyderabad18Rajkot15Visakhapatnam6Pune6Raipur6Amritsar6Panaji5SC4Surat3Nagpur3Jodhpur2Chandigarh2Agra1Jabalpur1Guwahati1Cochin1Varanasi1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 270A8Section 271(1)(c)5Section 2744Section 80G3Section 143(3)2Section 271A2Penalty2

SHRI SARAFRAJ AHMED ,UDAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(4), UDAIPUR

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 535/JODH/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur07 May 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.K.Saini & Shri A. T. Varkeyshri Sarfaraj Ahmed Vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward- Pan: Afypa8123R 1(4), Udaipur, Rajasthan- C/O Shrawan Kumar Gupta, 313001. Advocate, 416, Surya Chamber Radio Market, Nehru Bazar, Jaipur. (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 271ASection 274

D E R PER A. T. Varkey, J.M. This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Udaipur dated 20.09.2018 for AY 2010-11 confirming the penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) imposed by the AO. 2 Shri

DEEPAK KUMAR RAJORIA,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD-1(2), BIKANER

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 170/JODH/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur11 Aug 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Assessing Authority Tax Was Paid & Adjust From Tds The Appellant Was Aware Of The Fact That There Is Any Form By Filing Which The Penalty May Be Dropped So The Penalty Was Never Leviable In This Case Therefore The Penalty U/S 270A May Please Be Cancelled. 3. The Appellant Prays For Justice & Relief. 4. The Appellant May Please Be Permitted To Raise Any Addition Or Alternative Ground At Or Before The Hearing.”

Section 143(3)Section 270ASection 271(1)(C)Section 274Section 80G

D E R PER: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi, JM The assessee has filed an appeal against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [herein after “NFAC/Ld.CIT(A)”] dated 28.11.2022 for the assessment year 2017-18. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:- “1.On the fact and circumstances of the case worthy CIT(A) has erred