Search: penalty u/s 271

5 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 249(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 14710 Section 271(1)(b)8 Section 143(3)6 Section 142(1)6 Limitation/Time-bar5 Section 2744 Section 144B3 Section 1443 Reassessment

SANGRAM RAM,BIKANER vs. ITO, WARD -1(1), BIKANER

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 119/JODH/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur20 Jan 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri B. R. Baskaran & Dr. S. Seethalakshmi

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263Section 271(1)(b)Section 274

249 ITR 323 not decided each ground as such the order of CIT(A) is illegal.” 3. Briefly the facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual and receives income from agricultural activities. The assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the I.T. Act was completed by the AO on 27.12.2017 determining the total income at Rs.3

SANGRAM RAM,BIKANER vs. ITO, WARD -1(1), BIKANER

SANGRAM RAM,BIKANER vs. ITO, WARD -1(1), BIKANER

SANGRAM RAM,BIKANER vs. ITO, WARD -1(1), BIKANER

CHAINARAM,JODHPUR. vs. ITO, WARD-3(1), JODHPUR

CHAINARAM,JODHPUR vs. ITO, WARD-3(1), JODHPUR

CHAINARAM,JODHPUR vs. ITO, WARD-3(1), JODHPUR