Search: penalty u/s 271 | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Condonation of Delayclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai306 Jaipur189 Ahmedabad179 Delhi174 Chennai161 Pune135 Surat122 Kolkata121 Hyderabad112 Indore108 Bangalore91 Rajkot61 Chandigarh50 Nagpur47 Cochin39 Amritsar39 Lucknow34 Patna30 Visakhapatnam26 Cuttack25 Guwahati24 Agra22 Raipur19 Panaji13 Jabalpur11 Ranchi10 Allahabad9 Dehradun6 Jodhpur6 Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 12A12 Section 1110 Section 271(1)(c)8 Section 1546 Section 271(1)(b)6 Condonation of Delay6 Section 143(3)3 Section 142(1)3 Penalty3

SMT. JAYA MOGRA,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 333/JODH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur20 Sept 2023AY 2009-10

Section 127Section 132Section 271(1)(c)

condonation of delay with following prayers: “It is very humbly submitted that : 1. The penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act was initiated

KEWAL KANWAR BHANDARI ,JODHPUR vs. ITO, WARD-3(1), JODHPUR

Appeal is hereby dismissed

ITA 651/JODH/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur07 Jul 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Learned Cit(A). Vide Impugned Order, Learned Cit(A) Has Upheld The Penalty Order, By Observing In The Manner As Under:-

Section 250(6)2

Addition to Income2

For Appellant: Smt. Raksha Birla, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Karni Dan, Addl. CIT (Sr. DR)

Section 14Section 142(1)Section 147Section 271(1)(b)

penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT. Act, 1961. Thus, the appeal raised by the appellant is dismissed.” 6. Arguments heard. File perused. Contentions 7. Ld. AR for the appellant has submitted that non compliance with the notices issued u/s 142(1) of the Act during assessment proceedings, relating to the assessment year 2016-17 was not intentional. Another

SEEMA PANDIT,MOUNT AU vs. ITO, WARD, MOUNT ABU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 160/JODH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur17 Jul 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: The Cit(A) To Rectify The Order. The Cit(A) Has Rejected The Application U/S 154 Vide Order Dated 29.3.2019 & Served The Order On The Assessee On 19.4.2019. After Rejection Of His Application U/S 154, The Assessee Has Immediately Filed This Appeal Before The Hon'Ble Tribunal..

Section 154Section 250(6)

condonation of delay before the CIT(A) on the ground of illness of her husband and bad condition faced by her family. (ii). As the assessee could not attend the hearing before the CIT(A), the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal on the ground of delay as well as for non- prosecution. (iii). The assessee is a primary school teacher

RAJESH KALRA,HANUMANGARH TOWN vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1,, BIKANER

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 37/JODH/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur17 Aug 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri Dr. Dipak P. Ripoterajesh Kalra, Vs. Dcit, Circle – 1, Prop. M/S. Zodiac Bikaner – 334001, Imaging & Diagnostic Rajasthan. Centre, Hanumangarh -335513, Rajasthan. Pan/Gir No. : Akapk9599E Appellant .. Respondent Assessee By : None Revenue By : Ms. Prerana Choudhary, Jcit Dr Date Of Hearing 17.08.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 17.08.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Assessee Has Filed The Appeal Against The Order Of The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi/ Cit(A) & Passed U/S 271(1)(C) & U/Sec 250 Of The Act.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Ms. Prerana Choudhary

Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(C)Section 271(1)(c)

u/s 271(1)(C) and U/sec 250 of the Act. 2. There is a delay of 85 days in filing the appeal before the Honble Tribunal and the assessee has filed an affidavit for condonation of delay. Whereas, the facts mentioned in the affidavit are reasonable and the Ld.DR has no specific Rajesh Kalra, Hanumangarh. objections. Accordingly, we condone

ACIT, CIRCLE (EXEMPTION), , JODHPUR vs. PALI TEXTILE COMMON EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT, PALI

In the result the appeal of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 294/JODH/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur22 Aug 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Its Hearing Before Your Honour.”

Section 11Section 11(1)(d)Section 12ASection 143(3)

condonation of delay in seeking registration was not available. 8.3 In order to provide relief to such trusts and remove hardship in genuine cases, section 12A of the Income-tax Act has been amended to provide that in a case where a trust or institution has been granted registration under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act, the benefit

PALI TEXTILE COMMON EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT,PALI vs. CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 67/JODH/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur22 Aug 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Its Hearing Before Your Honour.”

Section 11Section 11(1)(d)Section 12ASection 143(3)

condonation of delay in seeking registration was not available. 8.3 In order to provide relief to such trusts and remove hardship in genuine cases, section 12A of the Income-tax Act has been amended to provide that in a case where a trust or institution has been granted registration under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act, the benefit