Search: house property

3 results for “house property”+ Section 271(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 698 Section 115B6 Section 69A4 Section 2633 Section 143(3)3 Section 1392 Business Income2 Unexplained Investment2 Unexplained Money2

PAWAN KUMAR JAIN ,HANUMANGARH vs. PR. CIT-1, JODHPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 30/JODH/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur07 Sept 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Us.

For Appellant: Shri Rajendra Jain (C.A.)For Respondent: Smt. Sanchita Kumar (CIT) a

Section 143(3)Section 263

section 115BBE. 2. It is also noted that this income of the assessee would not have been discovered unless an action u/s 133A of the IT Act, 11 Shri Pawan Kumar Jain vs. Pr. CIT 1961 was conducted. Hence, penalty u/s 271(1)© is hereby initiated for concealing true income on the amount of Rs. 43,00,935/- being undisclosed

SATYA NARAYAN CHOUDHARY ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in part

PAWAN KUMAR JAIN ,HANUMANGARH vs. PR. CIT-1, JODHPUR

SATYA NARAYAN CHOUDHARY ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR

PAWAN KUMAR JAIN ,HANUMANGARH vs. PR. CIT-1, JODHPUR

SATYA NARAYAN CHOUDHARY ,UDAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR

SATYA NARAYAN CHOUDHARY ,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, UDAIPUR