SHAHNAJ,NEAR BHERUDANJI WELL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, INCOME TAX OFFICE
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 712/JODH/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur01 Jan 2025AY 2013-14
Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Dr Mitha Lal Meenasmt. Shanaj Vs The Ito W/O Shri Aslam Khan Ward-2, Churu, Near Bherudan Ji Well,Ward No. 22 Churu Sardarshahar,Churu – 331 403 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Fpmps 3570 D
Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 50CSection 54F
section 144 of the Act. In other rulings, it is not proved that investment was made by the assessee as in these cases property was purchased prior to sale.
There is plethora of decisions, ratio of which Clearly states that while allowing deduction u/s. 54B or 54F it is not necessary that one cannot construct or purchase
Property or register